» Articles » PMID: 9209882

Load-displacement Properties of the Thoracolumbar Calf Spine: Experimental Results and Comparison to Known Human Data

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9209882
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The availability of human cadaveric spine specimens for in vitro tests is limited and the risk of infection is now of vital concern. As an alternative or supplement, calf spines have been used as models for human spines, in particular to evaluate spinal implants. However, neither qualitative nor quantitative biomechanical data on calf spines are available for comparison with data on human specimens. The purpose of this study was to determine the fundamental biomechanical properties of calf spines and to compare them with existing data from human specimens. Range of motion, neutral zone, and stiffness properties of thoracolumbar calf spines (T6-L6) were determined under pure moment loading in flexion and extension, axial left/right rotation and right/left lateral bending. Biomechanical similarities were observed between the calf and reported human data, most notably in axial rotation and lateral bending. Range of motion in the lumbar spine in flexion and extension was somewhat less in the calf than that typically reported for the human, though still within the range. These results suggest that the calf spine can be considered on a limited basis as a model for the human spine in certain in vitro tests.

Citing Articles

Chiropractic Treatment of Dairy Cows.

Wagner F, Hesse F, Wehrle J, Mulling C Vet Sci. 2024; 11(11).

PMID: 39591344 PMC: 11598983. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11110570.


A novel spine tester TO GO.

Jansen J, Zengerle L, Steiner M, Sciortino V, Tryfonidou M, Wilke H JOR Spine. 2024; 7(4):e70002.

PMID: 39469185 PMC: 11513258. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70002.


Biomechanical analysis of the tandem spinal external fixation in a multiple-level noncontiguous lumbar fractures model: a finite element analysis.

Chen H, Kang Y, Yan Y, Wang H, Peng W, Liao Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1395197.

PMID: 38962665 PMC: 11219947. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1395197.


The Injection of Gels Through an Intact Annulus Maintains Biomechanical Performance without Extrusion Risk.

Wilke H, Fuchs H, Benz K, Mollenhauer J, Gaissmaier C, Heuer F Gels. 2024; 10(4).

PMID: 38667688 PMC: 11049287. DOI: 10.3390/gels10040269.


Running, jumping, hunting, and scavenging: Functional analysis of vertebral mobility and backbone properties in carnivorans.

Belyaev R, Nikolskaia P, Bushuev A, Panyutina A, Kozhanova D, Prilepskaya N J Anat. 2023; 244(2):205-231.

PMID: 37837214 PMC: 10780164. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13955.


References
1.
Crisco J, Panjabi M, Wang E, Price M, Pelker R . The injured canine cervical spine after six months of healing. An in vitro three-dimensional study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15(10):1047-52. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199015100-00012. View

2.
Farcy J, Weidenbaum M, Michelsen C, Hoeltzel D, Athanasiou K . A comparative biomechanical study of spinal fixation using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(9):877-81. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198711000-00008. View

3.
Gregersen G, Lucas D . An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967; 49(2):247-62. View

4.
Panjabi M . Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(10):1129-34. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198810000-00013. View

5.
Zdeblick T, Shirado O, McAfee P, DeGroot H, Warden K . Anterior spinal fixation after lumbar corpectomy. A study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(4):527-34. View