» Articles » PMID: 9184183

Randomized Comparison of Etoposide Pharmacokinetics After Oral Etoposide Phosphate and Oral Etoposide

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9184183
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks, with escalation to 175 mg m(-2) from course 3 when possible. Patients were randomized to receive oral etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide on day 1 of course 1 and the alternative compound on day 1 of course 2. Fifteen patients received two or more courses and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic comparisons. The median AUC(inf) (area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to infinity) of etoposide was 77.7 mg l(-1) h after etoposide phosphate (95% CI 61.3-100.5) and 62.0 mg l(-1) h after oral etoposide (95% CI 52.2-76.9). The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05). However, the inter-patient variability of etoposide AUC(inf) was not improved (coefficients of variation 42.3% and 48.4%). Etoposide phosphate was undetectable in plasma after oral administration. Toxicities of oral etoposide phosphate were not different from those known for etoposide. In conclusion, oral etoposide phosphate does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over oral etoposide.

Citing Articles

Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer - dilemmas and solutions.

Rezonja R, Knez L, Cufer T, Mrhar A Radiol Oncol. 2013; 47(1):1-13.

PMID: 23450046 PMC: 3573828. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2013-0008.


Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.

Stuurman F, Nuijen B, Beijnen J, Schellens J Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013; 52(6):399-414.

PMID: 23420518 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-013-0040-2.


Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Toffoli G, Corona G, Basso B, Boiocchi M Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004; 43(7):441-66.

PMID: 15139794 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200443070-00002.


Absorption rate limit considerations for oral phosphate prodrugs.

Heimbach T, Oh D, Li L, Forsberg M, Savolainen J, Leppanen J Pharm Res. 2003; 20(6):848-56.

PMID: 12817887 DOI: 10.1023/a:1023827017224.


Extended-schedule oral etoposide in selected neoplasms and overview of administration and scheduling issues.

Hainsworth J Drugs. 2000; 58 Suppl 3:51-6.

PMID: 10711842 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199958003-00008.


References
1.
Pfluger K, Hahn M, Holz J, Schmidt L, Kohl P, Fritsch H . Pharmacokinetics of etoposide: correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters with clinical conditions. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993; 31(5):350-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00686147. View

2.
Harvey V, Slevin M, Joel S, Smythe M, Johnston A, Wrigley P . Variable bioavailability following repeated oral doses of etoposide. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1985; 21(11):1315-9. DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(85)90310-4. View

3.
Slevin M, Joel S, Whomsley R, Devenport K, Harvey V, Osborne R . The effect of dose on the bioavailability of oral etoposide: confirmation of a clinically relevant observation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989; 24(5):329-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF00304768. View

4.
Sessa C, Zucchetti M, Cerny T, Pagani O, Cavalli F, De Fusco M . Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral etoposide phosphate. J Clin Oncol. 1995; 13(1):200-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.200. View

5.
Hainsworth J, Levitan N, WAMPLER G, Belani C, Seyedsadr M, Randolph J . Phase II randomized study of cisplatin plus etoposide phosphate or etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1995; 13(6):1436-42. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.6.1436. View