» Articles » PMID: 9171176

Management of Postoperative Infections After Spinal Instrumentation

Overview
Journal J Neurosurg
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 1997 Jun 1
PMID 9171176
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The authors retrospectively reviewed 452 consecutively treated patients who underwent a spinal instrumentation procedure at a single institution to establish which patients and which surgical approaches might be associated with an increased risk of developing deep wound infections and to determine the efficacy with which the institution's current treatment strategy eradicates these infections. Wound infections occurred in 17 patients (10 men and seven women) with spinal instrumentation (incidence 3.8%). All infections occurred after posterior spinal instrumentation procedures (7.2%); there were no infections after anterior instrumentation procedures regardless of the level. Each patient was assigned an infection risk factor (RF) score depending on the number of RFs identified in an individual patient preoperatively. The mean RF score of patients who developed infections was 2.18, whereas the mean RF score for a procedure-matched, infection-free control group was 0.71. The mean number of days from surgery to clinical presentation was 27.6 days (range 4-120 days), and the mean increase in hospitalization time for the subset of patients who developed infections was 16.6 days. The most common organism isolated from wound cultures was Staphylococcus aureus (nine of 17 cases). Of the 17 patients, five had infections involving multiple organisms. All patients were infection free at a minimum of 8 months follow-up review. The current treatment regimen advocated at this institution consists of operative debridement of the infected wound, a course of intravenous followed by oral antibiotic medications, insertion of an antibiotic-containing irrigation-suction system for a mean of 5 days, and maintenance of the instrumentation system within the infected wound.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Additional Surgical Decompression on Functional Outcome in Pyogenic Spinal Epidural Abscess With No Neurological Deficit.

Kim M, Desai A, Yu D, Sanker V, Kim S, Jeon I Korean J Neurotrauma. 2025; 20(4):276-288.

PMID: 39803337 PMC: 11711023. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e48.


Practice preference and evidence analysis on topical use of tobramycin powder in lumbar spine surgery: A Multi-National AO spine survey with systematic review of the literature.

Sotiris V, Muthu S, Gary M, Cho S, Kato S, Lewis S World Neurosurg X. 2024; 24:100397.

PMID: 39391070 PMC: 11466638. DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100397.


Impact of Plastic Surgery and an Enhanced Prophylaxis Protocol on Cervical Spine Surgery Infection.

Choudhri T, Li A, Ali M, Spiera Z, Marayati N, Schupper A Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024; 32(3):445-451.

PMID: 39104945 PMC: 11298146. DOI: 10.1177/22925503221120542.


Is an Elevated Preoperative CRP Level a Predictive Factor for Wound Healing Disorders following Lumbar Spine Surgery?.

Pinchuk A, Luchtmann M, Neyazi B, Dumitru C, Stein K, Sandalcioglu I J Pers Med. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063921 PMC: 11278350. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070667.


Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of postoperative spinal wound infections: a systematic review.

Pappalardo G, Schneider S, Kotsias A, Jeyaraman M, Schafer L, Migliorini F Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(5):2303-2313.

PMID: 38753028 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03983-x.