» Articles » PMID: 36102993

Incidence of Surgical Site Infections After Cervical Spine Surgery: Results of a Single-center Cohort Study Adhering to Multimodal Preventive Wound Control Protocol

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Sep 14
PMID 36102993
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The incidence of surgical site infections is considered a relevant indicator of perioperative and postoperative care quality. The aim of this study is to analyze and evaluate SSIs after elective cervical spine surgery under the guidance of our preventive multimodal wound protocol.

Methods: A monocentric observational cohort study analyzed 797 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery from 2005 to 2010 (mean age 51.58 ± 11.74 year, male 56.09%, mean BMI 26.87 ± 4.41, ASA score 1-2 in 81.68% of patients), fulfilling the entry criteria: (1) cervical spine surgery performed by neurosurgeons (degenerative disease 85.19%, trauma 11.04%, tumor 3.76%), (2) elective surgery, (3) postoperative care in our neurointensive care unit. Our preventive wound control protocol management focused mainly on antibiotic prophylaxis, wound hygiene regime, and drainage equipment. All wound complications and surgical site infections were monitored up for 1 year after surgery.

Results: We had only 2 (0.25%) patients with SSI after cervical spine surgery-one organ/space infection (osteomyelitis, primary due to liquorrhea) after anterior surgical approach, and one deep surgical site infection (due to dehiscence) after posterior approach. We had 17 (2.13%) patients with some wound complications (secretion 7, dehiscence 4, hematoma 1, edema 3, and liquorrhea 2) that were not classified as SSI according to the CDC guidelines.

Conclusion: Concerning our study population of patients undergoing elective cervical surgery, with ASA scores 1-2 in 81.68% of our patients, the incidence of SSI was 0.14% after anterior surgical approach, 1.4% after posterior surgical approach, and 0.25% altogether in the referred cohort.

Citing Articles

Wound Microbiota and Its Impact on Wound Healing.

Zielinska M, Pawlowska A, Orzel A, Sulej L, Muzyka-Placzynska K, Baran A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(24).

PMID: 38139146 PMC: 10743523. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417318.


Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following cervical laminoplasty: A retrospective clinical study.

Wang J, Chang Y, Suo M, Huang H, Liu X, Li Z Int Wound J. 2023; .

PMID: 37859579 PMC: 10828128. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14450.

References
1.
van Niekerk J, Vos M, Stein A, Braakman-Jansen L, Voor In t Holt A, van Gemert-Pijnen J . Risk factors for surgical site infections using a data-driven approach. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0240995. PMC: 7592760. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240995. View

2.
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hubner M, Klek S . ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017; 36(3):623-650. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013. View

3.
Kolasinski W . Surgical site infections - review of current knowledge, methods of prevention. Pol Przegl Chir. 2019; 91(4):41-47. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7253. View

4.
Greene L . Guide to the elimination of orthopedic surgery surgical site infections: an executive summary of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology elimination guide. Am J Infect Control. 2011; 40(4):384-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.05.011. View

5.
Bratzler D, Dellinger E, Olsen K, Perl T, Auwaerter P, Bolon M . Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013; 14(1):73-156. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999. View