» Articles » PMID: 9104033

Echolocation Signals of the Greater Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus Ferrumequinum) in Transfer Flight and During Landing

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 1997 Apr 1
PMID 9104033
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Echolocation signals of horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae) consist of a relatively long component of constant frequency (CF) which is preceded by an initial frequency-modulated (iFM) component and followed by a terminal frequency-modulated (tFM) component. To examine the role of these components in echolocation, four bats were trained to fly from a perch to a landing bar. A dual camera system allowed reconstruction of the flight paths in three dimensions. Echolocation signals were recorded, analyzed, and correlated with the flight behavior of the bats. It was confirmed that during flight the bats compensate the Doppler shifts which are produced by their own flight movement. In free flight they emit per wing beat one single signal of long duration, with little variation in the three signal components. In approach flight the bats reduce pulse duration and interval with decreasing target range. The iFM is not varied with respect to target range, suggesting that this component plays little role in the processing of echolocating a target of interest. The bandwidth of the tFM component is increased while its duration is shortened in proportion to decreasing target range, so that the signal-echo overlap of the FM component is avoided down to a target distance of 15 cm. These concurrent changes suggest that the tFM component is used for ranging. During the last 60 cm of the approach the bats compensated for the increase of echo SPL by lowering the emission level of the CF component by 6-9 dB and that of the tFM component by 9-11 dB per halving of range. The specific signal structure of horseshoe bats is discussed as an adaptation for the hunting of fluttering insects in highly cluttered environments.

Citing Articles

Prevalent Harmonic Interaction in the Bat Inferior Colliculus.

Cui Z, Yu C, Wang X, Yin K, Luo J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(49).

PMID: 39424367 PMC: 11622178. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0916-24.2024.


Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection.

Schoeppler D, Kost K, Schnitzler H, Denzinger A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2022; 209(1):191-202.

PMID: 36136120 PMC: 9898408. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0.


Pest consumption in a vineyard system by the lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus hipposideros).

Baroja U, Garin I, Aihartza J, Arrizabalaga-Escudero A, Vallejo N, Aldasoro M PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219265.

PMID: 31318887 PMC: 6638854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219265.


Precise Doppler shift compensation in the hipposiderid bat, Hipposideros armiger.

Schoeppler D, Schnitzler H, Denzinger A Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4598.

PMID: 29545520 PMC: 5854618. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22880-y.


Reduction of emission level in approach signals of greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis): No evidence for a closed loop control system for intensity compensation.

Budenz T, Denzinger A, Schnitzler H PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0194600.

PMID: 29543882 PMC: 5854437. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194600.