» Articles » PMID: 22717760

Convergence of Reference Frequencies by Multiple CF-FM Bats (Rhinolophus Ferrumequinum Nippon) During Paired Flights Evaluated with Onboard Microphones

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Jun 22
PMID 22717760
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The constant frequency component of the second harmonic (CF(2)) of echolocation sounds in Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon were measured using onboard telemetry microphones while the bats exhibited Doppler-shift compensation during flights with conspecifics. (1) The CF(2) frequency of pulses emitted by individual bats at rest (F (rest)) showed a long-term gradual decline by 0.22 kHz on average over a period of 3 months. The mean neighboring F (rest) (interindividual differences in F (rest) between neighboring bats when the bats were arranged in ascending order according to F (rest)) ranged from 0.08 to 0.11 kHz among 18 bats in a laboratory colony. (2) The standard deviation of observed echo CF(2) (reference frequency) for bats during paired flights ranged from 50 to 90 Hz, which was not significantly different from that during single flights. This finding suggests that during paired flights, bats exhibit Doppler-shift compensation with the same accuracy as when they fly alone. (3) In 60% (n = 29) of the cases, the difference in the reference frequency between two bats during paired flights significantly decreased compared to when the bats flew alone. However, only 15% of the cases (n = 7) showed a significant increase during paired flights. The difference in frequency between two bats did not increase even when the reference frequencies of the individuals were not statistically different during single flights.

Citing Articles

Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection.

Schoeppler D, Kost K, Schnitzler H, Denzinger A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2022; 209(1):191-202.

PMID: 36136120 PMC: 9898408. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0.


Echo reception in group flight by Japanese horseshoe bats, .

Hase K, Kadoya Y, Takeuchi Y, Kobayasi K, Hiryu S R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(2):211597.

PMID: 35154795 PMC: 8825988. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211597.


The resting frequency of echolocation signals changes with body temperature in the hipposiderid bat Hipposideros armiger.

Schoeppler D, Denzinger A, Schnitzler H J Exp Biol. 2022; 225(3).

PMID: 34989397 PMC: 8918815. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.243569.


The Sonar Model for Humpback Whale Song Revised.

Mercado III E Front Psychol. 2018; 9:1156.

PMID: 30061851 PMC: 6055024. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01156.


Precise Doppler shift compensation in the hipposiderid bat, Hipposideros armiger.

Schoeppler D, Schnitzler H, Denzinger A Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4598.

PMID: 29545520 PMC: 5854618. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22880-y.


References
1.
Chiu C, Xian W, Moss C . Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(35):13116-21. PMC: 2529029. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0804408105. View

2.
Hiryu S, Katsura K, Lin L, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y . Doppler-shift compensation in the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) recorded with a telemetry microphone system during flight. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 118(6):3927-33. DOI: 10.1121/1.2130940. View

3.
Gillam E, Ulanovsky N, McCracken G . Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1610):651-60. PMC: 2197216. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0047. View

4.
Jones G, Ransome R . Echolocation calls of bats are influenced by maternal effects and change over a lifetime. Proc Biol Sci. 1993; 252(1334):125-8. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0055. View

5.
Surlykke A, Moss C . Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 108(5 Pt 1):2419-29. DOI: 10.1121/1.1315295. View