» Articles » PMID: 9066099

External Vacuum Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: Use and Results

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9066099
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review assesses the continuing role of noninvasive vacuum therapy as treatment for erectile dysfunction and discusses the action of negative pressure in producing assisted erection. Through recent research in this area has centered on the development of pharmaceutical therapies, vacuum-therapy programs appear to be a consistent long-term option for patients experiencing either chronic or occasional impotence of any etiology. Very little testing is required before the initiation of vacuum treatment, and the overall; clinical success rate is approximately 90%. Significant success has been reported in more difficult patient populations, including those with veno-occlusive disorders and explanted penile prostheses. Vacuum therapy may also be used in conjunction with other therapies to enhance results. Contraindications to the use of vacuum therapy are few and primarily include patients with unexplained intermittent priapism and bleeding disorders. Side effects such as occasional numbness, pain, penile bruising, or petechiae have a low incidence. A recently reported survey of 5,847 vacuum users showed that 83.5% of patients continue to use the device for intercourse as desired. Patients should receive individual instruction in the use of these devices and should expect a learning or practice period to achieve optimal results. As newer treatments for erectile dysfunction gain increasing attention, it should be kept in mind that nearly every patient showing impotence of any degree or duration as well as patients who have failed other therapeutic choices are candidates for vacuum therapy.

Citing Articles

Erectile Dysfunction: Treatments, Advances and New Therapeutic Strategies.

Argiolas A, Argiolas F, Argiolas G, Melis M Brain Sci. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37239274 PMC: 10216368. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13050802.


Clinical use and implications of sexual devices and sexually explicit media.

Dewitte M, Reisman Y Nat Rev Urol. 2021; 18(6):359-377.

PMID: 33948009 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00456-2.


Application of Sex Aids in Men With Sexual Dysfunction: A Review.

Miranda E, Taniguchi H, Cao D, Hald G, Jannini E, Mulhall J J Sex Med. 2019; 16(6):767-780.

PMID: 31029536 PMC: 8519170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.265.


Enhanced external counterpulsation in rehabilitation of erectile dysfunction: a narrative literature review.

Raeissadat S, Javadi A, Allameh F Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018; 14:393-399.

PMID: 30584313 PMC: 6284534. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S181708.


Non-pharmacological and non-surgical strategies to promote sexual recovery for men with erectile dysfunction.

Wassersug R, Wibowo E Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(Suppl 5):S776-S794.

PMID: 29238658 PMC: 5715194. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.09.


References
1.
Meinhardt W, Lycklama a Nijeholt A, Kropman R, Zwartendijk J . The negative pressure device for erectile disorders: when does it fail?. J Urol. 1993; 149(5 Pt 2):1285-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36369-3. View

2.
Villeneuve R, Corcos J, Carmel M . Assisted erection follow-up with couples. J Sex Marital Ther. 1991; 17(2):94-100. DOI: 10.1080/00926239108404951. View

3.
Lewis J . Nursing management for patients using external vacuum devices: a unique opportunity. Urol Nurs. 1993; 13(3):80-5. View

4.
Korenman S, Viosca S . Use of a vacuum tumescence device in the management of impotence in men with a history of penile implant or severe pelvic disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40(1):61-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01831.x. View

5.
Marmar J, DeBenedictis T, Praiss D . The use of a vacuum constrictor device to augment a partial erection following an intracavernous injection. J Urol. 1988; 140(5):975-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41903-3. View