» Articles » PMID: 26657316

Minimally Invasive Infrapubic Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implant for Erectile Dysfunction: Evaluation of Efficacy, Satisfaction Profile and Complications

Overview
Journal Int J Impot Res
Date 2015 Dec 15
PMID 26657316
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED), the second most common male sexual disorder, has an important impact on man sexuality and quality of life affecting also female partner's sexual life. ED is usually related to cardiovascular disease or is an iatrogenic cause of pelvic surgery. Many non-surgical treatments have been developed with results that are controversial, while surgical treatment has reached high levels of satisfaction. The aim is to evaluate outcomes and complications related to prosthesis implant in patients suffering from ED not responding to conventional medical therapy or reporting side effects with such a therapy. One hundred eighty Caucasian male suffering from ED were selected. The patient population were divided into two groups: 84 patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome (group A) and 96 patients with dysfunction following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (group B). All subjects underwent primary inflatable penile prosthesis implant with an infrapubic minimally invasive approach. During 12 months of follow-up, we reported 3 (1.67%) explants for infection, 1 (0.56%) urethral erosion, 1 (0.56%) prosthesis extrusion while no intraoperative complications were reported. Mean International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) was 8.2 ± 4.0 and after the surgery (12 months later) was 20.6 ± 2.7. The improvement after the implant is significant in both groups without a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P-value 0.65). Mean Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) score 1 year after the implant is 72.2 ± 20.7, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups A and B (P-value 0.55). Implantation of an inflatable prosthesis, for treatment of ED, is a safe and efficacious approach; and the patient and partner satisfaction is very high. Surgical technique should be minimally invasive and latest technology equipment should be implanted in order to decrease after surgery common complications (infection and mechanical failure).

Citing Articles

How to improve functional outcome of inflatable penile implant surgery? a narrative review.

Vural A, De Bruyn H, van Renterghem K Int J Impot Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39966533 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-025-01030-9.


A global, propensity-score matched analysis of patients receiving inflatable penile prostheses and the risk of complications, infections, and re-interventions.

Foss H, Prebay Z, Ebbott D, Buck M, Li M, Chung P Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(8):1537-1545.

PMID: 39280665 PMC: 11399048. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-412.


Electrophysiological evaluation of alterations in penile sensation due to penile prosthesis implantation in patients with erectile dysfunction.

Erol I, Yildiz A, Karamik K, Anil H, Islamoglu E, Cakir T Asian J Urol. 2024; 10(4):541-545.

PMID: 39186443 PMC: 10659965. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.04.013.


Management of the anatomically complex penile implant candidate through an infrapubic incision: a review of surgical techniques and benefits.

Loh-Doyle J Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(2):252-259.

PMID: 38481867 PMC: 10932637. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-182.


Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

Pazir Y, Yanaral F, Caglar U, Ortac M, Sarilar O, Ozgor F Cureus. 2022; 14(6):e26097.

PMID: 35875283 PMC: 9298674. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26097.


References
1.
Schwartz E, Wong P, Graydon R . Sildenafil preserves intracorporeal smooth muscle after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004; 171(2 Pt 1):771-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000106970.97082.61. View

2.
Bernal R, Henry G . Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses. Adv Urol. 2012; 2012:707321. PMC: 3412090. DOI: 10.1155/2012/707321. View

3.
Fraiman , Lepor , McCullough . Changes in Penile Morphometrics in Men with Erectile Dysfunction after Nerve-Sparing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Mol Urol. 2000; 3(2):109-115. View

4.
Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G . AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol. 2000; 37(1):50-5. DOI: 10.1159/000020099. View

5.
Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M . Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med. 2008; 5(6):1503-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00819.x. View