» Articles » PMID: 9063788

A Multicenter Clinical Trial of a Biosynthetic Skin Replacement, Dermagraft-TC, Compared with Cryopreserved Human Cadaver Skin for Temporary Coverage of Excised Burn Wounds

Overview
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9063788
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This multicenter study compared the use of a biosynthetic human skin substitute with frozen human cadaver allograft for the temporary closure of excised burn wounds. Dermagraft-TC (Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc.) (DG-TC) consists of a synthetic material onto which human neonatal fibroblasts are cultured. Burn wounds in 66 patients with a mean age of 36 years and a mean burn size of 44% total body surface area (28% total body surface area full-thickness) were surgically excised. Two comparable sites, each approximately 1% total body surface area in size, were randomized to receive either DG-TC or allograft. Both sites were then treated in the same manner. When clinically indicated (> 5 days after application) both skin replacements were removed, and the wound beds were evaluated and prepared for grafting. DG-TC was equivalent or superior to allograft with regard to autograft take at postautograft day 14. DG-TC was also easier to remove, had no epidermal slough, and resulted in less bleeding than did allograft while maintaining an adequate wound bed. Overall satisfaction was better with DG-TC.

Citing Articles

Advancements in cell-based therapies for thermal burn wounds: a comprehensive systematic review of clinical trials outcomes.

Yassaghi Y, Nazerian Y, Niazi F, Niknejad H Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):277.

PMID: 39227861 PMC: 11373270. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-03901-2.


Skin Bank Establishment in Treatment of Severe Burn Injuries: Overview and Experience with Skin Allografts at the Vienna Burn Center.

Staud C, Resch A, Christ A, Borger A, Zaussinger M, Teufelsbauer M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510832 PMC: 10381394. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144717.


Role of gene therapy in treatment of cancer with craniofacial regeneration-current molecular strategies, future perspectives, and challenges: a narrative review.

Singh H J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023; 41(1):13-21.

PMID: 37218144 PMC: 10834268. DOI: 10.12701/jyms.2023.00073.


Evaluating polymeric biomaterials to improve next generation wound dressing design.

Hodge J, Zamierowski D, Robinson J, Mellott A Biomater Res. 2022; 26(1):50.

PMID: 36183134 PMC: 9526981. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-022-00291-5.


Portable hand-held bioprinters promote in situ tissue regeneration.

Pazhouhnia Z, Beheshtizadeh N, Namini M, Lotfibakhshaiesh N Bioeng Transl Med. 2022; 7(3):e10307.

PMID: 36176625 PMC: 9472017. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10307.