Diagnostic Tools for the Detection of Subclinical Hepatic Encephalopathy: Comparison of Standard and Computerized Psychometric Tests with Spectral-EEG

Overview

Journal Metab Brain Dis

Publisher Springer

Specialties Endocrinology
Neurology

Date 1996 Dec 1

PMID 8979251

Citations 21

Authors

P Amodio

J C Quero

F Del Piccolo

A Gatta

S W Schalm

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Unlabelled: The prevalence of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy (SHE) varies according to the diagnostic tool used in its detection. Since a standardised approach to the diagnosis of SHE is not yet available, we compared psychometric tests and EEG spectral analysis. On the same day 32 cirrhotic patients without overt hepatic encephalopathy and 18 controls were assessed by psychometric tests, both standard and computerized (CPT), and by EEG spectral analysis (EEG-SA). The CPT, measuring reaction time (Rt) and errors (er), were Font, Choice1, Choice2 and Scan test. The standard psychometric tests were the number connection test (NCT), the Reitan-B test, the Line Tracing Test [for time: LTT(t) and for errors: LTT(er)], and the Symbol Digit test (SD). Both psychometric tests [Reitan-B test, LTT(er) and CPT but Font (Rt) and Choice2 (er)] and EEG-SA parameters [mean dominant frequency (MDF) and theta power (theta %)] significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with albumin plasma levels. LTT(er), Scan, Font, Choice1 and Choice2 were significantly related to theta % and MDF. There was no control with positive EEG-SA, though one control was positive with LTT(t) and with the number of errors made during Font and Scan tests. The percentage of cirrhotics with positive EEG-SA was 34% (CI95% = 19-53), while 9-66% were positive with psychometric tests, depending on the test considered. In spite of the correlation between neuropsychological and neurophysiological parameters, the diagnostic agreement between EEG-SA and each psychometric test was not high.

In Conclusion: 1) neurophysiological and neuropsychological impairment in cirrhotics without overt hepatic encephalopathy were found linked to each other and to hepatic dysfunction; 2) psychometric tests were not sufficiently good predictors of EEG alterations; therefore, neuropsychological tools can not substitute neurophysiological ones to detect CNS dysfunction in liver disease.

Citing Articles

Advances in psychometric tests for screening minimal hepatic encephalopathy: From paper-and-pencil to computer-aided assessment.

Luo M, Ma P, Li L, Cao W Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019; 30(5):398-407.

PMID: 31060994 PMC: 6505643. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2019.18226.

The clinical use of quantitative EEG in cognitive disorders.

Kanda P, Anghinah R, Smidth M, Silva J Dement Neuropsychol. 2017; 3(3):195-203.

PMID: 29213628 PMC: 5618973. DOI: 10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30300004.

Electroencephalography and delirium in the postoperative period.

Palanca B, Wildes T, Ju Y, Ching S, Avidan M Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119(2):294-307.

PMID: 28854540 PMC: 6172974. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew475.

Qualifying and quantifying minimal hepatic encephalopathy.

Morgan M, Amodio P, Cook N, Jackson C, Kircheis G, Lauridsen M Metab Brain Dis. 2015; 31(6):1217-1229.

PMID: 26412229 DOI: 10.1007/s11011-015-9726-5.

Hepatic encephalopathy and sleepiness: an interesting connection?.

Montagnese S, Turco M, Amodio P J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015; 5(Suppl 1):S49-53.

PMID: 26041958 PMC: 4442851. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.06.006.

References

Albers I, Hartmann H, BIRCHER J, Creutzfeldt W . Superiority of the Child-Pugh classification to quantitative liver function tests for assessing prognosis of liver cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989; 24(3):269-76. DOI: 10.3109/00365528909093045. View

Schomerus H, Hamster W, Blunck H, Reinhard U, Mayer K, Dolle W . Latent portasystemic encephalopathy. I. Nature of cerebral functional defects and their effect on fitness to drive. Dig Dis Sci. 1981; 26(7):622-30. DOI: 10.1007/BF01367675. View

van der Rijt C, Schalm S . Quantitative EEG analysis and evoked potentials to measure (latent) hepatic encephalopathy. J Hepatol. 1992; 14(2-3):141-2. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8278(92)90148-i. View

Ono J, Hutson D, DOMBRO R, Levi J, Livingstone A, Zeppa R . Tryptophan and hepatic coma. Gastroenterology. 1978; 74(2 Pt 1):196-200. View

HYMAN R . Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol. 1953; 45(3):188-96. DOI: 10.1037/h0056940. View

Zeneroli M, Pinelli G, Gollini G, Penne A, Messori E, Zani G . Visual evoked potential: a diagnostic tool for the assessment of hepatic encephalopathy. Gut. 1984; 25(3):291-9. PMC: 1432299. DOI: 10.1136/gut.25.3.291. View

Gitlin N, Lewis D, Hinkley L . The diagnosis and prevalence of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in apparently healthy, ambulant, non-shunted patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1986; 3(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(86)80149-0. View

van der Rijt C, Schalm S, de Groot G, DE VLIEGER M . Objective measurement of hepatic encephalopathy by means of automated EEG analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984; 57(5):423-6. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90071-3. View

Tarter R, Hegedus A, Van Thiel D, Schade R, Gavaler J, Starzl T . Nonalcoholic cirrhosis associated with neuropsychological dysfunction in the absence of overt evidence of hepatic encephalopathy. Gastroenterology. 1984; 86(6):1421-7. PMC: 2963938. View

10.

Mehndiratta M, Sood G, Sarin S, Gupta M . Comparative evaluation of visual, somatosensory, and auditory evoked potentials in the detection of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in patients with nonalcoholic cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990; 85(7):799-803. View

11.

Jones E, Skolnick P, Gammal S, Basile A, Mullen K . NIH conference. The gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptor complex and hepatic encephalopathy. Some recent advances. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 110(7):532-46. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-110-7-532. View

12.

CONN H . Trailmaking and number-connection tests in the assessment of mental state in portal systemic encephalopathy. Am J Dig Dis. 1977; 22(6):541-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF01072510. View

13.

ZIEVE L . The mechanism of hepatic coma. Hepatology. 1981; 1(4):360-5. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840010414. View

14.

Rehnstrom S, Simert G, Hansson J, Johnson G, VANG J . Chronic hepatic encephalopathy. A psychometrical study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1977; 12(3):305-11. DOI: 10.3109/00365527709180932. View

15.

Posner M, Boies S, Eichelman W, Taylor R . Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. J Exp Psychol. 1969; 79(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1037/h0026947. View

16.

MIRSKY A, KORNETSKY C . ON THE DISSIMILAR EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON THE DIGIT SYMBOL SUBSTITUTION AND CONTINOUS PERFORMANCE TESTS. A REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY INTEGRATION OF BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE. Psychopharmacologia. 1964; 5:161-77. DOI: 10.1007/BF00413239. View

17.

Kullmann F, Hollerbach S, Holstege A, Scholmerich J . Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy: the diagnostic value of evoked potentials. J Hepatol. 1995; 22(1):101-10. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80267-3. View

18.

Davies M, Rowan M, Feely J . Flash visual evoked responses in the early encephalopathy of chronic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990; 25(12):1205-14. DOI: 10.3109/00365529008998555. View

19.

Rikkers L, Jenko P, RUDMAN D, Freides D . Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy: detection, prevalence, and relationship to nitrogen metabolism. Gastroenterology. 1978; 75(3):462-9. View

20.

Sternberg S . Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. Am Sci. 1969; 57(4):421-57. View