» Articles » PMID: 8915843

Gracile, Cuneate, and Spinal Trigeminal Projections to Inferior Olive in Rat and Monkey

Overview
Journal J Comp Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 1996 Nov 18
PMID 8915843
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the cat, somatosensory nuclei send substantial projections to the inferior olive, where they terminate in a somatotopic fashion. Although the organization of the cat inferior olive has been used to interpret data from other species, published data suggest this organization may not occur universally. The present study investigated whether the inferior olive in albino rats and cynomolgus monkeys receives the same brainstem somatosensory inputs, whether these inputs are organized somatotopically and, if so, how the organization compares with that in the cat. Projections from the gracile, cuneate and spinal trigeminal nuclei were labeled with wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase or with biotinylated dextran. The results were compared with data from cats (Berkley and Hand [1978] J. Comp. Neurol. 180:253-264). In the rat and monkey, the gracile, cuneate and spinal trigeminal nuclei all project to the contralateral inferior olive, where each nucleus has a distinct preferred terminal field. As in the cat, projections to the medial accessory olive and caudal dorsal accessory olive did not terminate in a precisely organized fashion. Projections to the rostral dorsal accessory olive, however, formed a clear somatotopic map. These somatotopic maps differed from those in the cat in that input from the trigeminal nucleus was confined rostrally, so that the caudal end only received input from the gracile and cuneate nuclei. These data indicate that similar organizational principles characterize the somatosensory projections to the inferior olives of the three species. Nevertheless, distinct species differences occur with regard to the details of this organization.

Citing Articles

The integrated brain network that controls respiration.

Krohn F, Novello M, van der Giessen R, De Zeeuw C, Pel J, Bosman L Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 36884287 PMC: 9995121. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.83654.


Modular organization of cerebellar climbing fiber inputs during goal-directed behavior.

Tsutsumi S, Hidaka N, Isomura Y, Matsuzaki M, Sakimura K, Kano M Elife. 2019; 8.

PMID: 31596238 PMC: 6844646. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.47021.


The anatomical pathway from the mesodiencephalic junction to the inferior olive relays perioral sensory signals to the cerebellum in the mouse.

Kubo R, Aiba A, Hashimoto K J Physiol. 2018; 596(16):3775-3791.

PMID: 29874406 PMC: 6092293. DOI: 10.1113/JP275836.


Methodological considerations for a chronic neural interface with the cuneate nucleus of macaques.

Suresh A, Winberry J, Versteeg C, Chowdhury R, Tomlinson T, Rosenow J J Neurophysiol. 2017; 118(6):3271-3281.

PMID: 28904101 PMC: 5814711. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00436.2017.


A neuro-inspired model-based closed-loop neuroprosthesis for the substitution of a cerebellar learning function in anesthetized rats.

Hogri R, Bamford S, Taub A, Magal A, Del Giudice P, Mintz M Sci Rep. 2015; 5:8451.

PMID: 25677559 PMC: 4327125. DOI: 10.1038/srep08451.