» Articles » PMID: 8893271

Comparison Between Permeability Coefficients in Rat and Human Jejunum

Overview
Journal Pharm Res
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 1996 Sep 1
PMID 8893271
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Our main aim is to determine the effective intestinal permeability (Peff) in the rat jejunum in situ for 10 compounds with different absorption mechanisms and a broad range of physico chemical properties, and then compare them with corresponding historical human in vivo Peff values.

Methods: The rat Peff coefficients are determined using an in situ perfusion model in anaesthetized animals. The perfusion flow rate used is 0.2 ml/min, which is 10 times lower than that used in humans. The viability of the method is assessed by testing the physiological function of the rat intestine during perfusions.

Results: The Peff for passively absorbed compounds is on average 3.6 times higher in humans compared to rats (Peff, man = 3.6 x Peff.rat+ 0.03.10(-4); R]2 = 1.00). Solutes with carrier-mediated absorption deviate from this relationship, which indicates that an absolute scaling of active processes from animal to man is difficult, and therefore needs further investigation. The fraction absorbed of drugs after oral administration in humans (fa) can be estimated from 1-e-(-2.Peff,man t rex/r.2.8).

Conclusions: Rat and human jejunum Peff-estimates of passively absorbed solutes correlate highly, and both can be used with precision to predict in vivo oral absorption in man. The carrier-mediated transport requires scaling between the models, since the transport maximum and/or substrate specificity might differ. Finally, we emphasize the absolute necessity of including marker compounds for continuous monitoring of intestinal viability.

Citing Articles

Use of physiologically based kinetic modeling to predict neurotoxicity and genotoxicity of methylglyoxal in humans.

Zheng L, Li X, Widjaja F, Liu C, Rietjens I NPJ Sci Food. 2024; 8(1):79.

PMID: 39368970 PMC: 11455947. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-024-00322-6.


Parameterization of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models: Workshop Summary Report.

Pepin X, Arora S, Borges L, Cano-Vega M, Carducci T, Chatterjee P Mol Pharm. 2024; 21(8):3697-3731.

PMID: 38946085 PMC: 11304397. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00526.


Current applications of intestinal organoids: a review.

Xiang T, Wang J, Li H Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):155.

PMID: 38816841 PMC: 11140936. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-03768-3.


Biomimetic Dispersive Solid-Phase Microextraction: A Novel Concept for High-Throughput Estimation of Human Oral Absorption of Organic Compounds.

Garcia-Moll M, Garcia-Moll L, Carrasco-Correa E, Oliver M, Simo-Alfonso E, Miro M Anal Chem. 2023; 95(35):13123-13131.

PMID: 37615399 PMC: 10483468. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01749.


Monotropein: A comprehensive review of biosynthesis, physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacology.

Wu M, Lai H, Peng W, Zhou X, Zhu L, Tu H Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1109940.

PMID: 36937894 PMC: 10017856. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1109940.


References
1.
Sinko P, Leesman G, Amidon G . Predicting fraction dose absorbed in humans using a macroscopic mass balance approach. Pharm Res. 1991; 8(8):979-88. DOI: 10.1023/a:1015892621261. View

2.
Artursson P, Karlsson J . Correlation between oral drug absorption in humans and apparent drug permeability coefficients in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 175(3):880-5. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)91647-u. View

3.
Lennernas H, Ahrenstedt O, Ungell A . Intestinal drug absorption during induced net water absorption in man; a mechanistic study using antipyrine, atenolol and enalaprilat. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994; 37(6):589-96. PMC: 1364820. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04309.x. View

4.
Yuasa H, Matsuda K, Watanabe J . Influence of anesthetic regimens on intestinal absorption in rats. Pharm Res. 1993; 10(6):884-8. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018917412696. View

5.
Amidon G, Lennernas H, Shah V, Crison J . A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res. 1995; 12(3):413-20. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016212804288. View