Influence of Anesthetic Regimens on Intestinal Absorption in Rats
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We compared the influence of anesthetic regimens using urethane (U), pentobarbital (P), ether (E), and ketamine/midazolam (K) on the intestinal absorption of several probes using a single-pass perfusion technique in rats. The selected probes were D-glucose (1 mM) for the resistance of the unstirred water layer (UWL), D-glucose (100 mM) for the capacity of carrier-mediated D-glucose transport, L-glucose, and urea for membrane-limited passive transport, and tritiated water (3H2O) for blood flow at the absorption site. The absorbed fraction of D-glucose (1 mM) was the smallest for U and the largest for P, suggesting that the resistance of UWL is the largest for U and the smallest for P. The absorbed fraction of D-glucose (100 mM) was the largest for P (U = E = K < P), suggesting a higher capacity of carrier-mediated D-glucose transport for P. The absorbed fraction of urea was similar for all anesthetics, while that of L-glucose was the smallest for K (U = P = E > K). Although the results for these two markers of membrane-limited passive transport were inconsistent, the passive permeability of the intestinal membrane may be lower when treating with K. The intestinal absorptions of D-glucose (1 and 100 mM), L-glucose, and urea were, in general, lower with any of the anesthetics than under nonanesthesia (N), suggesting increased resistance of UWL and decreased intestinal membrane permeability by carrier-mediated and passive transport under anesthesia. The only exception was the absorption of D-glucose (100 mM) under P, which was comparable to that under N.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Absorption Study of Acebutolol by Modulating P-glycoprotein with Verapamil in Rats.
Abushammala I, Abuwaked E, Fayyad H, Elqedra A, Ramadan M, Almasri I Turk J Pharm Sci. 2021; 17(6):673-678.
PMID: 33389978 PMC: 7786063. DOI: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2019.59862.
Peters S, Jones C, Ungell A, Hatley O Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016; 55(6):673-96.
PMID: 26895020 PMC: 4875961. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-015-0351-6.
Wong Y, Qian S, Zuo Z Pharm Res. 2014; 31(8):2107-23.
PMID: 24554118 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1312-8.
Absorption profiles of sanchinoside R1 and ginsenoside Rg1 in the rat intestine.
Liang F, Hua J Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2006; 30(4):261-8.
PMID: 16435571 DOI: 10.1007/BF03190630.
Kondo C, Onuki R, Kusuhara H, Suzuki H, Suzuki M, Okudaira N Pharm Res. 2005; 22(4):613-8.
PMID: 15846469 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-005-2487-9.