» Articles » PMID: 8883120

Comparison of Bone Densitometry of the Phalanges, Distal Forearm and Axial Skeleton in Early Postmenopausal Women Participating in the EPIC Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8883120
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present baseline bone densitometry from the Early Postmenopausal Interventional Cohort study (EPIC, sponsored by Merck, Sharp & Dohme) for the first time, in which 1609 women from England, Oregon, Hawaii and Denmark are participating to investigate the efficacy of daily oral alendronate to prevent early postmenopausal bone loss. We compared radiographic absorptiometry (RA) of the phalanges for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement with single-energy X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) of the distal forearm, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal forearm. In a random subgroup of 308 women, aged 45-60 years, on average 6 years since menopause (YSM), bone densitometry was measured once at baseline by RA of the phalanges besides the mandatory measurements by DXA. Bone densitometry was furthermore measured by SXA at the Danish site (89 women). Sixty-eight of the women had duplicate measurements performed within 1-3 weeks to evaluate the short-term precision error (CV%). One hundred and one healthy premenopausal women, aged 25-48 years, were recruited at the Danish and Hawaiian sites to establish a reference group. The precision error was 1.5% for RA of the phalanges and in the range 1.0-2.2% for SXA and DXA. BMD by RA correlated with BMD measured by SXA and DXA in the range 0.45 < r < 0.72 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, bone densitometry by RA of the phalanges is highly correlated with bone densitometry by SXA and DXA. RA of the phalanges has a short-term precision error comparable to that of SXA and DXA.

Citing Articles

Computed digital absorptiometry for measurement of phalangeal bone mineral mass on a slot-scanning digital radiography system.

Dendere R, Whiley S, Douglas T Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(11):2625-30.

PMID: 24985712 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2792-4.


Comparison of radiogrammetrical metacarpal indices in children and reference data from the First Zurich Longitudinal Study.

Martin D, Heckmann C, Neuhof J, Jenni O, Ranke M, Binder G Pediatr Radiol. 2012; 42(8):982-91.

PMID: 22669456 PMC: 3414699. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-012-2390-6.


Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.

Forsen L, Berntsen G, Meyer H, Tell G, Fonnebo V Eur J Epidemiol. 2008; 23(9):615-24.

PMID: 18594994 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-008-9271-1.


2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.

Brown J, Josse R CMAJ. 2002; 167(10 Suppl):S1-34.

PMID: 12427685 PMC: 134653.


Radiographic absorptiometry for measuring bone mass.

Ross P Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7 Suppl 3:S103-7.

PMID: 9536314 DOI: 10.1007/BF03194354.

References
1.
Cummings S, Black D, Nevitt M, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K . Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993; 341(8837):72-5. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8. View

2.
Mazess R, Peppler W, Chesney R, Lange T, Lindgren U, Smith Jr E . Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1984; 25(3):281-8. View

3.
Trouerbach W, BIRKENHAGER J, Schmitz P, van Hemert A, van Saase J, Collette H . A cross-sectional study of age-related loss of mineral content of phalangeal bone in men and women. Skeletal Radiol. 1988; 17(5):338-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF00367179. View

4.
Barnett E, Nordin B . The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol. 1960; 11:166-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(60)80012-8. View

5.
Pocock N, Eisman J, Yeates M, Sambrook P, Eberl S, Wren B . Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia. J Bone Miner Res. 1986; 1(4):369-75. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650010410. View