Homologous and Heterologous FISH Painting with PARM-PCR Chromosome-specific Probes in Mammals

Overview

Journal Mamm Genome

Specialty Genetics

Date 1996 Mar 1

PMID 8833239

Citations 4

Authors

D Milan

J Riquet

M Yerle

A Goureau

A Schmitz

E P Cribiu

G Frelat

J Gellin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Numerous loci can be amplified by PARM-PCR on 300 sorted chromosomes in low-stringency conditions (annealing at 30 degrees C during the two first cycles) to produce a probe that can be used in FISH painting experiments. We demonstrate that, depending on the primer chosen for the amplification, patterns of different quality can be obtained. In order to design a primer that allows amplification of coding sequences, we have shown that motifs of at least seven glutamic acid repeats (GAG or GAA codons) are present in human proteins more frequently than expected. Moreover, these repeats do not correspond to triplet expansion and can be conserved between species. Using probes prepared from sorted chromosomes with (GAG)7 primer, we were able to achieve homologous FISH painting on human, porcine, ovine, and bovine species, and bidirectional heterologous FISH painting between human and porcine species. As an example, using probes for human Chromosome (Chr) 19 and porcine Chrs 1 and 6, we clearly defined the regional homologies existing between those chromosomes.

Citing Articles

Sperm nuclear architecture is locally modified in presence of a Robertsonian translocation t(13;17).

Acloque H, Bonnet-Garnier A, Mompart F, Pinton A, Yerle-Bouissou M PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e78005.

PMID: 24205066 PMC: 3815027. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078005.

Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization in lung cancer as a diagnostic marker.

Truong K, Gerbault-Seureau M, Guilly M, Vielh P, Zalcman G, Livartowski A J Mol Diagn. 2001; 1(1):33-7.

PMID: 11272907 PMC: 1906883. DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60606-X.

Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting.

Guilly M, Fouchet P, de Chamisso P, Schmitz A, Dutrillaux B Chromosome Res. 1999; 7(3):213-21.

PMID: 10421381 DOI: 10.1023/a:1009251416856.

Characterization of reciprocal translocations in pigs using dual-colour chromosome painting and primed in situ DNA labelling.

Pinton A, Ducos A, Seguela A, Berland H, Darre R, Darre A Chromosome Res. 1999; 6(5):361-6.

PMID: 9872665 DOI: 10.1023/a:1009244415357.

References

Yerle M, Gellin J, Dalens M, Galman O . Localization on pig chromosome 6 of markers GPI, APOE, and ENO1, carried by human chromosomes 1 and 19, using in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1990; 54(1-2):86-91. DOI: 10.1159/000132966. View

Green H, Wang N . Codon reiteration and the evolution of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(10):4298-302. PMC: 43772. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4298. View

Schmitz A, Chaput B, Fouchet P, Guilly M, Frelat G, Vaiman M . Swine chromosomal DNA quantification by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation. Cytometry. 1992; 13(7):703-10. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990130706. View

Telenius H, Carter N, Bebb C, Nordenskjold M, Ponder B, Tunnacliffe A . Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics. 1992; 13(3):718-25. DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90147-k. View

Lengauer C, Riethman H, Cremer T . Painting of human chromosomes with probes generated from hybrid cell lines by PCR with Alu and L1 primers. Hum Genet. 1990; 86(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00205163. View

Schmitz A, Oustry A, Chaput B, Yerle M, Millan D, Frelat G . The bovine bivariate flow karyotype and peak identification by chromosome painting with PCR-generated probes. Mamm Genome. 1995; 6(6):415-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00355643. View

Telenius H, Pelmear A, Tunnacliffe A, Carter N, Behmel A, Ferguson-Smith M . Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992; 4(3):257-63. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.2870040311. View

Hayes H . Chromosome painting with human chromosome-specific DNA libraries reveals the extent and distribution of conserved segments in bovine chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1995; 71(2):168-74. DOI: 10.1159/000134100. View

Collins C, Kuo W, Segraves R, Fuscoe J, Pinkel D, Gray J . Construction and characterization of plasmid libraries enriched in sequences from single human chromosomes. Genomics. 1991; 11(4):997-1006. DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90025-a. View

10.

Vooijs M, Yu L, Tkachuk D, Pinkel D, Johnson D, Gray J . Libraries for each human chromosome, constructed from sorter-enriched chromosomes by using linker-adaptor PCR. Am J Hum Genet. 1993; 52(3):586-97. PMC: 1682175. View

11.

Fu Y, Kuhl D, Pizzuti A, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe J, Richards S . Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell. 1991; 67(6):1047-58. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90283-5. View

12.

Hadano S, Watanabe M, Yokoi H, Kogi M, Kondo I, Tsuchiya H . Laser microdissection and single unique primer PCR allow generation of regional chromosome DNA clones from a single human chromosome. Genomics. 1991; 11(2):364-73. DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90144-4. View

13.

Jauch A, Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Arnold N, Tofanelli S, Ishida T . Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89(18):8611-5. PMC: 49970. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8611. View

14.

Goureau A, Yerle M, Schmitz A, Riquet J, Milan D, Pinton P . Human and porcine correspondence of chromosome segments using bidirectional chromosome painting. Genomics. 1996; 36(2):252-62. DOI: 10.1006/geno.1996.0460. View

15.

Martin A, Northrup H, Ledbetter D, Trask B, van den Engh G, Le Beau M . Prenatal detection of 46,XY,rec(5),dup q, inv(5)(p13q33) using DNA analysis, flow cytometry, and in situ hybridization to supplement classical cytogenetic analysis. Am J Med Genet. 1988; 31(3):643-54. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320310320. View

16.

Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, Kunz J, Vogel W, Hameister H . Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting. Genomics. 1995; 26(2):372-8. DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(95)80222-8. View

17.

Korenberg J, Rykowski M . Human genome organization: Alu, lines, and the molecular structure of metaphase chromosome bands. Cell. 1988; 53(3):391-400. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90159-6. View

18.

Van Dilla M, Deaven L . Construction of gene libraries for each human chromosome. Cytometry. 1990; 11(1):208-18. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990110124. View

19.

Milan D, Yerle M, Schmitz A, Chaput B, Vaiman M, Frelat G . A PCR-based method to amplify DNA with random primers: determining the chromosomal content of porcine flow-karyotype peaks by chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993; 62(2-3):139-41. DOI: 10.1159/000133457. View

20.

Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier H, LIMA-DE-FARIA A, Fronicke L . Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat Genet. 1994; 6(4):342-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng0494-342. View