» Articles » PMID: 8831120

Fusion Rate After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Carbon Fiber Implant: 1-year Follow-up of 51 Patients

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8831120
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Problems associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have traditionally included the need for donor bone, prolonged healing time of donor bone, the difficulty of cutting precise bony channels, the risk of retropulsion of graft, postoperative collapse of the bone graft, and pseudarthrosis. To avoid these problems a carbon fiber reinforced polymer implant cage has been developed to facilitate interbody fusion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the technical problems and fusion rate associated with these new device for PLIF. Between April 1991 and December 1993, 65 pairs of these implant cages were sold in Sweden. They were traced to six hospitals, where they had been used in the treatment of 51 patients operated on at a total of 65 levels. All PLIF were supplemented with VSP (Variable Screw Placement) instrumentation. All medical records were evaluated and all patients were examined with plain radiographs taken at least 1 year after surgery. If that investigation did not show a clear fusion they were also evaluated with CT (18 patients, 27 levels). No intraoperative problems with the device have been reported; 44 patients (86%) and 58 levels (89%) achieved successful fusion. All patients bar one maintained their immediately obtained postoperative disc height. CT with 1-mm slices and sagittal reconstruction is most helpful if radiographs are difficult to interpret.

Citing Articles

The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma applicated in spinal fusion surgery: A meta-analysis.

Yu H, Zhou Z, Yu B, Sun T, Tang Q, Jia Y Front Surg. 2022; 9:924753.

PMID: 36211298 PMC: 9537823. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.924753.


Lumbar Interspinous Process Fixation and Fusion with Stand-Alone Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion Implant in Patients with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Undergoing Decompression for Spinal Stenosis.

Postacchini F, Postacchini R, Menchetti P, Sessa P, Paolino M, Cinotti G Asian Spine J. 2016; 10(1):27-37.

PMID: 26949455 PMC: 4764537. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.27.


Trabecular metal spacers as standalone or with pedicle screw augmentation, in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Van de Kelft E, Van Goethem J Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(11):2597-606.

PMID: 26362051 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4229-y.


A 10-year follow-up of transpedicular screw fixation and intervertebral autogenous posterior iliac crest bone graft or intervertebral B-Twin system in failed back surgery syndrome.

Cincu R, Lorente F, Gomez J, Eiras J, Agrawal A Asian J Neurosurg. 2015; 10(2):75-82.

PMID: 25972934 PMC: 4421972. DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.145120.


100 consecutive cases of degenerative lumbar conditions using a non-threaded locking screw system with a 90-degree locking cap.

McAfee P, Cunningham B, Tortolani P, Fedder I, Sefter J, Davis C SAS J. 2015; 3(1):1-11.

PMID: 25802623 PMC: 4365587. DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2008-0022-RR.


References
1.
Rothman S, Glenn Jr W . CT evaluation of interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (193):47-56. View

2.
COLLIS J . Total disc replacement: a modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Report of 750 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (193):64-7. View

3.
Dennis S, Watkins R, Landaker S, Dillin W, Springer D . Comparison of disc space heights after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989; 14(8):876-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198908000-00019. View

4.
Brantigan J, Steffee A . A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(14):2106-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00030. View

5.
Brantigan J . Pseudarthrosis rate after allograft posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw and plate fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(11):1271-9; discussion 1280. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199405310-00014. View