» Articles » PMID: 24757473

Mid-term Clinical Outcomes of Stand-alone Posterior Interbody Fusion with Rectangular Cages: A 4-year-minimum Follow-up

Overview
Journal Korean J Spine
Date 2014 Apr 24
PMID 24757473
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine minimum 4 years of clinical outcomes including fusion rate, revision rate and complications of patients who underwent placement of rectangular stand-alone cages.

Methods: Thirty-three cases of degenerative spine that had been followed for at least 4-years were reviewed retrospectively. Cages were inserted at L4-L5 level or L5-S1 in 27 or in 6 cases respectively. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Odom's criteria, fusion rate, intervertebral disc height and lumbar lordosis were determined pre- and post-operatively on standing x-rays. Amount of intra- and postoperative blood loss, total volume transfused, duration of surgery and perioperative complications were also evaluated.

Results: The mean VAS score of back pain and sciatica were improved from 8.0 and 7.0 points to 3.4 and 2.4 during 1 years follow-up visit and the scores was raised gradually. Also, during the follow-up, 94% of patients showed excellent or good outcomes by the Odom's criteria. Intervertebral disc height was increased from 8.2±1.4mm to 9.2±1.9mm at the first year of follow-up, however, found to be decreased and stabilized to 8.3±1.8mm after 2 years. The fusion rate was approximately 91% after 4 year postoperative. The segmental angle of lordosis was increased significantly by two years but it was not maintained after four years. A statistically insignificant change in total lumbar lordosis was also observed. Three patients (9%) had experienced perioperative complications.

Conclusion: The use of rectangular stand-alone cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) resulted in a various degree of subsidence and demonstrate very low complication rate, high functional stability and improved clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease.

Citing Articles

A Novel Nonpedicular Screw-Based Fixation in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Chen M, Chen J Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:5619350.

PMID: 28164125 PMC: 5259603. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5619350.


Ten Important Tips in Treating a Patient with Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Omidi-Kashani F, Hejrati H, Ariamanesh S Asian Spine J. 2016; 10(5):955-963.

PMID: 27790328 PMC: 5081335. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.5.955.

References
1.
Ma G . Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with specialized instruments. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (193):57-63. View

2.
Goh J, Wong H, Thambyah A, Yu C . Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(1):35-9; discussion 40. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00008. View

3.
Fogel G, Toohey J, Neidre A, Brantigan J . Outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the 9-mm width lumbar I/F cage and the variable screw placement system. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2009; 18(2):77-82. View

4.
Tribus C, Belanger T, Zdeblick T . The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(1):58-61. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199901010-00014. View

5.
Diedrich O, Luring C, Pennekamp P, Perlick L, Wallny T, Kraft C . [Effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the lumbar sagittal spinal profile]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003; 141(4):425-32. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41561. View