» Articles » PMID: 8809593

Physiological and Therapeutic Effects of High Frequency Electrical Pulses

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1996 Apr 1
PMID 8809593
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The results of stimulating human subjects with the LISS Cranial Stimulator (LCS) and the LISS Body Stimulator (LBS) include an increase or decrease in the activities of certain neurotransmitters and neurohormones and the reduction of associated pain, insomnia, depression, and spasticity. The effects were documented in human subjects with measurements of the serum concentration of the various agents and assessments of the symptoms being performed before and after stimulation. The stimulators had a carrier frequency of 15,000 hz, which utilizes the bulk capacitance of the body, and a 15 hz modulating bioactive frequency. The second modulating frequency presently used, 500 hz, reduces the energy input to the patient by half. Significant increases in levels of CSF serotonin and beta endorphin were recorded post stimulation. There were also elevations in the levels of plasma serotonin, beta endorphin, GABA and DHEA together with diminished levels of cortisol and tryptophan. Concomitant with these changes were significant improvements in the symptoms of pain, insomnia, spasticity, depression, and headache.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study.

Palmer A, Hamann T, Liese J, Muller B, Kropp P, Jurgens T Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1343093.

PMID: 38419716 PMC: 10900232. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1343093.


Effects of electrostatic therapy on nighttime sleep and daytime symptoms in patients with chronic insomnia: Evidences from an open label study.

Dai Y, Qin Q, Chen B, Chen L, Sun Q, Vgontzas A Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1047240.

PMID: 36685220 PMC: 9853294. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1047240.


Comparison of the effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation and midazolam as preoperative treatment in geriatric patients: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial.

Park B, Jin S, Kim W, Kang D, Choi Y, Lee Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(35):e30336.

PMID: 36107590 PMC: 9439722. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030336.


A Critical Review of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Neuromodulation in Clinical and Non-clinical Samples.

Brunye T, Patterson J, Wooten T, Hussey E Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:625321.

PMID: 33597854 PMC: 7882621. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.625321.


Cranial electrical stimulation: potential use in reducing sleep and mood disturbances in persons with dementia and their family caregivers.

Rose K, Taylor A, Bourguignon C, Utz S, Goehler L Fam Community Health. 2008; 31(3):240-6.

PMID: 18552605 PMC: 2810542. DOI: 10.1097/01.FCH.0000324481.40459.69.


References
1.
Konzelman Jr J . Glossodynia: a case report. Cranio. 1984; 3(1):82-3. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1984.11678091. View

2.
HOCHMAN R . Neurotransmitter modulator (TENS) for control of dental operative pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988; 116(2):208-12. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0338. View

3.
Graubard K, Hartline D . Full-wave rectification from a mixed electrical-chemical synapse. Science. 1987; 237(4814):535-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.2885921. View

4.
Cassuto J, Liss S, Bennett A . The use of modulated energy carried on a high frequency wave for the relief of intractable pain. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1993; 13(4):239-41. View

5.
Solomon S, Elkind A, Freitag F, Gallagher R, Moore K, SWERDLOW B . Safety and effectiveness of cranial electrotherapy in the treatment of tension headache. Headache. 1989; 29(7):445-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed2907445.x. View