» Articles » PMID: 2668227

Safety and Effectiveness of Cranial Electrotherapy in the Treatment of Tension Headache

Overview
Journal Headache
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 1989 Jul 1
PMID 2668227
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One hundred patients were enrolled in a multicenter double-blind study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Pain Suppressor Unit, a cranial electrotherapy stimulator for the symptomatic treatment of tension headaches. Treatment consisted of extremely low level, high frequency current applied transcranially. Pain scores before and after 20 minute treatments of individual headaches as well as patient and physician global evaluations were the primary efficacy variables. Following use of the active unit, patients reported an average reduction in pain intensity of approximately 35%. Placebo patients reported a reduction of approximately 18%. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The active unit was rated as moderately or highly effective in 40% by physicians, and in 36% by patients. Both physicians and patients scored the placebo unit moderately or highly effective for only 16%. The difference in ordered outcomes was statistically significant (p = 0.004). Approximately 10% of patients in each group reported at least one minor adverse experience. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation is distinct from TENS, and is safe and often effective in ameliorating the pain intensity of tension headaches. It should be considered as an alternative to the chronic usage of analgesics.

Citing Articles

Observational Study to Assesses the Efficacy and Safety of Microcurrent Therapy with a Portable Device in Patients Suffering from Chronic Back Pain, Skeletal System Pain, Fibromyalgia, Migraine or Depression.

Marmann P, Wiatrek W Med Devices (Auckl). 2023; 16:261-280.

PMID: 38090106 PMC: 10712256. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S436667.


Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Johnson M, Paley C, Wittkopf P, Mulvey M, Jones G Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(6).

PMID: 35744066 PMC: 9230499. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060803.


A Critical Review of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Neuromodulation in Clinical and Non-clinical Samples.

Brunye T, Patterson J, Wooten T, Hussey E Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:625321.

PMID: 33597854 PMC: 7882621. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.625321.


Quantitative Electroencephalography Analysis (qEEG) of Neuro-Electro-Adaptive Therapy 12™ [NEAT12] Up-Regulates Cortical Potentials in an Alcoholic during Protracted Abstinence: Putative Anti-Craving Implications.

Waite R, Oscar-Berman M, RBraverman E, Barh D, Blum K J Addict Res Ther. 2015; 5(1):1-7.

PMID: 25927012 PMC: 4410813. DOI: 10.4172/2155-6105.1000171.


ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy.

Physiother Can. 2011; 62(5):1-80.

PMID: 21886384 PMC: 3031347. DOI: 10.3138/ptc.62.5.