» Articles » PMID: 8804090

Measurement of Pain: the Psychometric Properties of the Pain-O-Meter, a Simple, Inexpensive Pain Assessment Tool That Could Change Health Care Practices

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 1996 Sep 1
PMID 8804090
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A self-administered pain assessment tool called the Pain-O-Meter (POM) was developed for the purposes of improving assessment and management of pain in acute and chronic pain patients. The POM is a hard, white, plastic tool that measures 8-in. long by 2-in. wide and 1-in. thick. Two methods for assessing pain are located on the POM. The first is a 10-cm visual analogue scale (POM-VAS) with a moveable marker that patients use to rate their pain. The second is a list of 15 sensory and 11 affective word descriptors (WDS). Each WDS is assigned an intensity value that can be as low as 1 or as high as 5. A pain intensity score is provided for the sensory and the affective WDSs. This psychometric study, which employed correlational and comparative designs, investigated the test-retest reliability and the concurrent and construct validity of the POM-VAS and the POM-WDS in 279 patients with acute or chronic pain. High correlations were found between initial and repeat pain intensity ratings on the POM-VAS (r = 0.88, P < 0.001) and POM-WDS (r + 0.84, P < 0.001) (test-retest reliability). Correlations between the POM-WDS and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) (r = 0.69, P < 0.001) and POM-VAS (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) supported the concurrent validity of the POM-WDS. Construct validity was also supported for the Pain-O-Meter by showing that pain scores decreased significantly for POM-WDS (t + 5.53, P < 0.001), and POM-VAS (t = 6.18, P < 0.001) after the patients were treated with pain medication. The use of a pain tool, such as the POM, could improve patient care by facilitating the documentation of pain and evaluation of pain relief measures.

Citing Articles

Proteomic analysis reveals biomarkers associated with performance-based joint function and patient-reported outcomes in knee osteoarthritis.

Naili J, Ahmed A, Hedstrom M, Simonsen M, Brostrom E, Harris H Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024; 7(1):100543.

PMID: 39640420 PMC: 11616498. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100543.


Physical therapist-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy and exercise for older outpatients with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Nagasawa Y, Shibata A, Fukamachi H, Ishii K, Oka K J Phys Ther Sci. 2022; 34(12):784-790.

PMID: 36507082 PMC: 9711971. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.784.


The Current View on the Paradox of Pain in Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Bogdanova O, Bogdanov V, Pizano A, Bouvard M, Cazalets J, Mellen N Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:910824.

PMID: 35935443 PMC: 9352888. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.910824.


Efficacy of radiofrequency and laser thermal ablation in solving thyroid nodule-related symptoms and cosmetic concerns. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cesareo R, Egiddi S, Naciu A, Tabacco G, Leoncini A, Napoli N Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022; 23(5):1051-1061.

PMID: 35768704 PMC: 9515040. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-022-09743-8.


Psychosocial Interventions for Pain Management in Breast Cancer Survivors: A RE-AIM Evaluation.

Cox-Martin E, Phimphasone-Brady P, Hoffecker L, Glasgow R J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022; 30(1):182-196.

PMID: 35562602 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-022-09874-9.