Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Methods: One hundred consecutive patients aged ≥18 years who presented with a chief complaint of pain were asked to record pain scores via a paper VAS and digitally via both the laptop computer and mobile phone. Ninety-eight subjects, 51 men (age, 44 ± 16 years) and 47 women (age, 46 ± 15 years), were included. A mixed-model analysis of covariance with the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to detect differences between the paper and digital VAS scores. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to test for instrument agreement between the platforms. The minimal clinically important difference was set at 1.4 cm (14% of total scale length) for detecting clinical relevance between the three VAS platforms. A paired one-tailed Student -test was used to determine whether differences between the digital and paper measurement platforms exceeded 14% ( < 0.05).
Results: A significant difference in scores was found between the mobile phone-based (32.9% ± 0.4%) and both the laptop computer- and paper-based platforms (31.0% ± 0.4%, < 0.01 for both). These differences were not clinically relevant (minimal clinically important difference <1.4 cm). No statistically significant difference was observed between the paper and laptop computer platforms. Measurement agreement was found between the paper- and laptop computer-based platforms (mean difference, 0.0% ± 0.5%; no proportional bias detected) but not between the paper- and mobile phone-based platforms (mean difference, 1.9% ± 0.5%; proportional bias detected).
Conclusion: No clinically relevant difference exists between the traditional paper-based VAS assessment and VAS scores obtained from laptop computer- and mobile phone-based platforms.
Visibelli A, Finetti R, Roncaglia B, Poli P, Spiga O, Santucci A Front Artif Intell. 2025; 8:1557894.
PMID: 40051572 PMC: 11882547. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2025.1557894.
Mannstadt I, Gibbons J, Amen T, Rajan M, Young S, Tischler H Arthroplast Today. 2025; 32:101620.
PMID: 40035045 PMC: 11874531. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101620.
Study Protocol for a Yoga-Based Lifestyle Modification Program for Leucorrhea Disorders.
Mittal A, Krishna N, Singh D, Kavuri V Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78294.
PMID: 40027048 PMC: 11872154. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78294.
Gauhar V, Somani B, Castellani D, Fong K, Gadzhiev N, Persaud S World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):142.
PMID: 40019574 PMC: 11870961. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05477-9.
Garside J, Bellaire C, Perraut G, Argintar E Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):79.
PMID: 40009107 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04203-w.