» Articles » PMID: 8744314

Constrained Diffusion or Immobile Fraction on Cell Surfaces: a New Interpretation

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1996 Jun 1
PMID 8744314
Citations 166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protein lateral mobility in cell membranes is generally measured using fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR). Since the development of this technique, the data have been interpreted by assuming free Brownian diffusion of cell surface receptors in two dimensions, an interpretation that requires that a subset of the diffusing species remains immobile. The origin of this so-called immobile fraction remains a mystery. In FPR, the motions of thousands of particles are inherently averaged, inevitably masking the details of individual motions. Recently, tracking of individual cell surface receptors has identified several distinct types of motion (Gross and Webb, 1988; Ghosh and Webb, 1988, 1990, 1994; Kusumi et al. 1993; Qian et al. 1991; Slattery, 1995), thereby calling into question the classical interpretation of FPR data as free Brownian motion of a limited mobile fraction. We have measured the motion of fluorescently labeled immunoglobulin E complexed to high affinity receptors (Fc epsilon RI) on rat basophilic leukemia cells using both single particle tracking and FPR. As in previous studies, our tracking results show that individual receptors may diffuse freely, or may exhibit restricted, time-dependent (anomalous) diffusion. Accordingly, we have analyzed FPR data by a new model to take this varied motion into account, and we show that the immobile fraction may be due to particles moving with the anomalous subdiffusion associated with restricted lateral mobility. Anomalous subdiffusion denotes random molecular motion in which the mean square displacements grow as a power law in time with a fractional positive exponent less than one. These findings call for a new model of cell membrane structure.

Citing Articles

p14 forms meso-scale assemblies upon phase separation with NPM1.

Gibbs E, Miao Q, Ferrolino M, Bajpai R, Hassan A, Phillips A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9531.

PMID: 39528457 PMC: 11555371. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53904-z.


Plasticity-induced actin polymerization in the dendritic shaft regulates intracellular AMPA receptor trafficking.

Wong V, Houlihan P, Liu H, Walpita D, DeSantis M, Liu Z Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39146380 PMC: 11326776. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.80622.


Biomolecular condensates form spatially inhomogeneous network fluids.

Dar F, Cohen S, Mitrea D, Phillips A, Nagy G, Leite W Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3413.

PMID: 38649740 PMC: 11035652. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47602-z.


p14 forms meso-scale assemblies upon phase separation with NPM1.

Gibbs E, Miao Q, Ferrolino M, Bajpai R, Hassan A, Phillips A Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 38106181 PMC: 10723529. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3592059/v1.


Similarly slow diffusion of BAM and SecYEG complexes in live E. coli cells observed with 3D spt-PALM.

Lee Upton S, Tay J, Schwartz D, Sousa M Biophys J. 2023; 122(22):4382-4394.

PMID: 37853695 PMC: 10698321. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.017.


References
1.
Singer S, Nicolson G . The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972; 175(4023):720-31. DOI: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. View

2.
Kulczycki Jr A, Metzger H . The interaction of IgE with rat basophilic leukemia cells. II. Quantitative aspects of the binding reaction. J Exp Med. 1974; 140(6):1676-95. PMC: 2139755. DOI: 10.1084/jem.140.6.1676. View

3.
SAFFMAN P, DELBRUCK M . Brownian motion in biological membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975; 72(8):3111-3. PMC: 432930. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3111. View

4.
Axelrod D, Koppel D, Schlessinger J, Elson E, Webb W . Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J. 1976; 16(9):1055-69. PMC: 1334945. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4. View

5.
Barsumian E, ISERSKY C, Petrino M, Siraganian R . IgE-induced histamine release from rat basophilic leukemia cell lines: isolation of releasing and nonreleasing clones. Eur J Immunol. 1981; 11(4):317-23. DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830110410. View