» Articles » PMID: 864432

Enhancement and Phototransduction in the Ventral Eye of Limulus

Overview
Journal J Gen Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1977 May 1
PMID 864432
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limulus ventral photoreceptors were voltage clamped to the resting (dark) potential and stimulated by a 20-ms test flash and a 1-s conditioning flash. At a constant level of adaptation, we measured the response to the test flash given in the dark (control) and the incremental response produced when the test flash occurred within the duration of the conditioning flash. The incremental response is defined as the response to the conditioning and test flashes minus the response to the conditioning flash given alone. When the test flash was presented within 100 ms after the onset of the conditioning flash we observed that: (a) for dim conditioning flashes the incremental response equaled the control response; (b) for intermediate intensity conditioning flashes the incremental response was greater than the control response (we refer to this as enhancement); (c) for high intensity conditioning flashes the incremental response nearly equaled the control response. Using 10-mum diam spots of illumnination, we stimulated two spatially separate regions of one photoreceptor. When the test flash and the conditioning flash were presented to the same region, enhancement was present; but when the flashes were applied to separate regions, enhancement was nearly absent. This result indicates that enhancement is localized to the region of illumination. We discuss mechanisms that may account for enhancement.

Citing Articles

Rapid coupling of calcium release to depolarization in Limulus polyphemus ventral photoreceptors as revealed by microphotolysis and confocal microscopy.

Ukhanov K, Payne R J Neurosci. 1997; 17(5):1701-9.

PMID: 9030629 PMC: 6573376.


Fast desensitization of the response to InsP3 in Limulus ventral photoreceptors.

Levitan I, Hillman P, Payne R Biophys J. 1993; 64(4):1354-60.

PMID: 8494989 PMC: 1262453. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81470-X.


Sensitization in voltage clamped barnacle photoreceptors.

Bolsover S J Physiol. 1980; 306:65-78.

PMID: 7463379 PMC: 1282995. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013386.


Adapting bump model for ventral photoreceptors of Limulus.

Wong F, Knight B, Dodge F J Gen Physiol. 1982; 79(6):1089-113.

PMID: 7108487 PMC: 2216452. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.79.6.1089.


Quantitative pressure injection of picoliter volumes into Limulus ventral photoreceptors.

Corson D, Fein A Biophys J. 1983; 44(3):299-304.

PMID: 6661488 PMC: 1434850. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84303-3.


References
1.
FUORTES M, HODGKIN A . CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964; 172:239-63. PMC: 1368830. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. View

2.
FUORTES M, Yeandle S . PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF DISCRETE POTENTIAL WAVES IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS. J Gen Physiol. 1964; 47:443-63. PMC: 2195394. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.443. View

3.
Hubbard R . The molecular weight of rhodopsin and the nature of the rhodopsin-digitonin complex. J Gen Physiol. 1954; 37(3):381-99. PMC: 2147455. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.37.3.381. View

4.
WALD G, Brown P . The molar extinction of rhodopsin. J Gen Physiol. 1953; 37(2):189-200. PMC: 2147432. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.37.2.189. View

5.
Baylor D, HODGKIN A, Lamb T . Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J Physiol. 1974; 242(3):759-91. PMC: 1330661. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010733. View