» Articles » PMID: 8614933

Determination of Duplex Doppler Ultrasound Criteria Appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial

Overview
Journal Stroke
Date 1996 Apr 1
PMID 8614933
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail (NASCET) demonstrated the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients with > or = 70% carotid stenosis. Screening for detection of significant carotid occlusive disease has relied on duplex Doppler imaging. However, traditional duplex categories (50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) are not directly applicable to NASCET. We sought to evaluate duplex criteria for determination of > or = 70% carotid stenosis.

Methods: Duplex scan and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotids), performed within 1 month of each other, were reviewed by blinded readers. Arteriographic stenosis was determined by the NASCET method. Duplex measurements of peak systolic and end-diastolic velocity (PSV, EDV) were recorded, and ratios of velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries (ICA, CCA) were calculated. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy were determined.

Results: Interobserver agreement for measurement of arteriographic stenosis was "almost perfect" (kappa=0.86). The criteria chosen for detection of > or = 70% stenosis were PSVICA>210 cm/s (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 77%; PPV, 68% NPV, 96% accuracy, 83%) EDVICA>70 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 60%; PPV, 73%; NPV, 86%; accuracy 77%), PSVica/PSVCCA >3.0 (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 78%; PPV, 70%; NPV, 94%; accuracy, 83%), and EDVICA/EDVCCA>3.3 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 65%; PPV, 65% NPV, 100%; accuracy, 79%).

Conclusions: We conclude that > or = 70% carotid stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex Doppler ultrasound. Individual vascular laboratories must validate their own results.

Citing Articles

Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study.

Wu S, Wang H, Guo J, Zhang F, Pan D, Ning Y J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):338.

PMID: 38902703 PMC: 11188523. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02838-0.


Quantifying Carotid Stenosis: History, Current Applications, Limitations, and Potential: How Imaging Is Changing the Scenario.

Saba L, Scicolone R, Johansson E, Nardi V, Lanzino G, Kakkos S Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38255688 PMC: 10821425. DOI: 10.3390/life14010073.


Utility of carotid ultrasound on prediction of 1-year mortality in emergency department patients with neurological deficits: A 10-year population-based cohort study.

Chen C, Sung C, Jeng J, Fan C, Chang J, Chen J PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0277951.

PMID: 36534671 PMC: 9762588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277951.


Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Cassola N, Baptista-Silva J, Nakano L, Flumignan C, Sesso R, Vasconcelos V Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 7:CD013172.

PMID: 35815652 PMC: 9272405. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.


The clinical implications of adopting new criteria for the grading of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Curtis N, Necas M, Versteeg M Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021; 21(1):36-44.

PMID: 34760499 PMC: 8409869. DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12080.