» Articles » PMID: 8594044

Automatic Assessment of Electromyogram Quality

Overview
Date 1995 Nov 1
PMID 8594044
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Power spectrum analysis of the diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi) is time consuming, and no criteria have been developed to objectively quantify contamination of the signal. The present work describes a set of computer algorithms that automatically select EMGdi free of the electrocardiogram and numerically quantify the common artifacts that affect the EMGdi. The algorithms were tested 1) on human EMGdi (n = 5) obtained with esophageal electrodes positioned at the level of the gastroesophageal junction, 2) on EMGdi obtained in mongrel dogs (n = 5) with intramuscular electrodes in the costal diaphragm, and 3) on computer-simulated power spectra. For authentic and simulated power spectra, indexes were obtained by the algorithms and were able to quantify signal disturbances induced by noise, electrode motion, esophageal peristalsis (in humans), and non-QRS complex-related electrocardiogram activity. With the index inclusion thresholds set to levels that allowed for a high signal acceptance rate with relatively small artifact-induced fluctuations (10-15%) of the EMGdi center frequency, the computer algorithms were found to be as reliable as or more reliable than other methods, including careful visual selection of the time domain signals by experienced analysts. In conclusion, the frequency domain application of computer algorithms offers a reliable and reproducible means to objectively quantify the sources that contaminate the interference pattern EMG.

Citing Articles

Simplification of Mobility Tests and Data Processing to Increase Applicability of Wearable Sensors as Diagnostic Tools for Parkinson's Disease.

Khalil R, Shulman L, Gruber-Baldini A, Shakya S, Fenderson R, Van Hoven M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(15).

PMID: 39124030 PMC: 11314738. DOI: 10.3390/s24154983.


Assessment of Self-report, Palpation, and Surface Electromyography Dataset During Isometric Muscle Contraction.

Lim J, Lu L, Goonewardena K, Liu J, Tan Y Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):208.

PMID: 38360835 PMC: 10869346. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03030-8.


Multi-day dataset of forearm and wrist electromyogram for hand gesture recognition and biometrics.

Pradhan A, He J, Jiang N Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):733.

PMID: 36450807 PMC: 9712490. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01836-y.


Design and Validation of a Multimodal Wearable Device for Simultaneous Collection of Electrocardiogram, Electromyogram, and Electrodermal Activity.

McNaboe R, Beardslee L, Kong Y, Smith B, Chen I, Posada-Quintero H Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(22).

PMID: 36433449 PMC: 9695854. DOI: 10.3390/s22228851.


Convolutional neural network-based respiration analysis of electrical activities of the diaphragm.

Lee H, Lee G, Lee J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16671.

PMID: 36198756 PMC: 9534871. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21165-9.