» Articles » PMID: 8576489

Clustered Breast Microcalcifications: Evaluation by Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Subtraction MRI

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8576489
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI in the diagnosis of isolated clustered calcifications of the breast.

Materials And Methods: One hundred seventy-two patients underwent surgical biopsy for isolated clustered breast calcifications. Their mammograms showed round (n = 88) or linear/irregular (n = 84) microcalcifications. All patients had a preoperative Gd-DOTA-enhanced subtraction dynamic study. Any early contrast enhancement in the breast parenchyma concomitant with early enhancement of normal vessels was considered positive.

Results: Fifty-eight in situ carcinomas, 22 invasive carcinomas, and 92 benign lesions were found at histological analysis. Dynamic MR sequences showed early contrast enhancement in 76 of 80 malignant lesions (sensitivity 95%) and in 45 of 92 benign lesions (specificity 51%). Two invasive and two intraductal carcinomas did not show early contrast enhancement. Three independent observers agreed in rating early contrast enhancement in 143 of 172 lesions.

Conclusion: Poor specificity limits the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI in distinguishing benign from malignant microcalcifications on mammography.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in benign and malignant breast masses.

Tao Z, Qi H, Ma Y Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(4):2870-2877.

PMID: 37193163 PMC: 10182532.


Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.

Lee J, Jung J, Kim W, Park C, Lee R, Kim H BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):934.

PMID: 32993586 PMC: 7526123. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07443-7.


Diagnostic value of a spiral breast computed tomography system equipped with photon counting detector technology in patients with implants: An observational study of our initial experiences.

Ruby L, Shim S, Berger N, Marcon M, Frauenfelder T, Boss A Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(30):e20797.

PMID: 32791669 PMC: 7387031. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020797.


US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Hrkac Pustahija A, Ivanac G, Brkljacic B Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018; 24(4):187-194.

PMID: 30091708 PMC: 6045520. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.17414.


Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.

Jiang Y, Lou J, Wang S, Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang D PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e99669.

PMID: 24927476 PMC: 4057215. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099669.