Pulmonary Venous Flow Velocities Recorded by Transthoracic Doppler Ultrasound: Relation to Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressures
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate whether pulmonary venous flow variables measured by transthoracic Doppler ultrasound can help identify patients with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic or filling pressures, or both.
Background: A widened left atrial pressure A wave occurs when left ventricular end-diastolic pressure is increased. Increased duration of pulmonary venous flow reversal at atrial systole might therefore be a marker for elevated end-diastolic pressure. Decreased systolic pulmonary venous flow is shown to be related to increased left ventricular filling pressure in studies using transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
Methods: Left ventricular pressures at late diastole were measured by fluid-filled catheters in 50 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Pulmonary venous and mitral flow velocities were recorded by transthoracic pulsed Doppler ultrasound.
Results: Adequate recordings were obtained in 45 patients. Pulmonary venous flow reversal exceeding the duration of the mitral A wave predicted left ventricular end-diastolic pressure > 15 mm Hg with a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.79. This difference in flow duration correlated well with the increase in ventricular pressure (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) at atrial systole and the end-diastolic pressure (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). The systolic fraction of pulmonary venous flow was markedly decreased (< 0.4) in all patients with a pre-A pressure (left ventricular pressure before atrial systole) > 18 mm Hg.
Conclusions: Pulmonary venous flow reversal exceeding the duration of the mitral A wave indicates an exaggerated increase in left ventricular late diastolic pressure. Pulmonary venous systolic fraction < 0.4 suggests markedly increased ventricular filling pressure.
Robinson S, Ring L, Oxborough D, Harkness A, Bennett S, Rana B Echo Res Pract. 2024; 11(1):16.
PMID: 38825710 PMC: 11145885. DOI: 10.1186/s44156-024-00051-2.
Caiati C, Argentiero A, Forleo C, Favale S, Lepera M J Clin Med. 2021; 10(24).
PMID: 34945249 PMC: 8706207. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245954.
Mazza A, Townsend D, Torin G, Schiavon L, Camerotto A, Rigatelli G Biomed Pharmacother. 2021; 130:110596.
PMID: 34321170 PMC: 8963534. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110596.
Yuan J, Li Y, Sun J Front Physiol. 2021; 12:665483.
PMID: 33927647 PMC: 8076790. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.665483.
Arief H, Wiktorski T, Thomas P Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(8).
PMID: 33921160 PMC: 8071578. DOI: 10.3390/s21082801.