» Articles » PMID: 26069448

Feasibility of a Novel Atrioventricular Delay Optimization Method Using Transmitral and Pulmonary Venous Flow in Patients with Sequential Ventricular Pacing or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Overview
Journal J Echocardiogr
Date 2015 Jun 13
PMID 26069448
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although several echo-Doppler methods were proposed to optimize atrioventricular (AV) delay in patients with sequential ventricular pacing, "echo-guided" AV optimization has not been widely adopted clinically. A combination of trasmitral flow (TMF) and pulmonary venous flow (PVF) measurements may be beneficial to further optimize AV delay to achieve better cardiac function. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and usefulness of AV delay optimization by combined use of TMF and PVF.

Methods: A total of 32 patients after sequential ventricular pacemaker implantation were enrolled and studied. The optimal AV delay was defined as the timing to minimize the duration between PVF reversal (a) wave and the duration of the "A" wave of TMF. Stroke volume was measured at the "optimized" AV delay (AVD(OPT)) and was compared with that obtained at shorter (AVD(OPT) - 50 ms) and longer (AVD(OPT) + 50 ms) AV delays.

Results: AV optimization was feasible in 27 of 32 patients (87%). Stroke volume at AVD(OPT) was significantly higher than that at shorter or longer AV delay (63 ± 18 ml vs. 57 ± 15 ml vs. 56 ± 16 ml, P = 0.001).

Conclusions: AV delay optimization using TMF and PV flow was feasible. Usefulness of this method requires further investigation with a larger study population.

Citing Articles

AV timing in pacemaker patients with first-degree AV block: which is preferable, intrinsic AV conduction or pacing?.

Aizawa Y, Nakai T, Ikeya Y, Kogawa R, Saito Y, Toyama K Heart Vessels. 2022; 37(8):1411-1417.

PMID: 35133499 PMC: 9239935. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-022-02037-8.


Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac dyssynchrony in patients with congestive heart failure.

Qin C, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Wang B, Ye Z, Wang Y J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016; 36(3):434-441.

PMID: 27376817 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1605-8.

References
1.
Khaykin Y, Exner D, Birnie D, Sapp J, Aggarwal S, Sambelashvili A . Adjusting the timing of left-ventricular pacing using electrocardiogram and device electrograms. Europace. 2011; 13(10):1464-70. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur146. View

2.
Ellenbogen K, Gold M, Meyer T, Fernndez Lozano I, Mittal S, Waggoner A . Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography-guided, and algorithmic.... Circulation. 2010; 122(25):2660-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.992552. View

3.
Antonini L, Auriti A, Pasceri V, Meo A, Pristipino C, Varveri A . Optimization of the atrioventricular delay in sequential and biventricular pacing: physiological bases, critical review, and new purposes. Europace. 2012; 14(7):929-38. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur425. View

4.
Okura H, Takada Y, Yamabe A, Ozaki T, Yamagishi H, Toda I . Prevalence and correlates of physiological valvular regurgitation in healthy subjects. Circ J. 2011; 75(11):2699-704. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-11-0277. View

5.
Ishikawa T, Sugano T, Sumita S, Nakagawa T, Hanada K, Kosuge M . Optimal atrioventricular delay setting determined by evoked QT interval in patients with implanted stimulus-T-driven DDDR pacemakers. Europace. 2001; 3(1):46-51. DOI: 10.1053/eupc.2000.0143. View