» Articles » PMID: 8494391

In Vitro Activities of New Macrolides and Rifapentine Against Brucella Spp

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1993 Apr 1
PMID 8494391
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have tested the in vitro activities of streptomycin, rifampin, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, four new macrolides (roxithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and dirithromycin), and rifapentine against 62 strains of Brucella spp. Azithromycin and clarithromycin were, respectively, eight- and twofold more active than erythromycins (MIC for 90% of strains = 2, 8, and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively). The activity of rifapentine was similar to that of rifampin (MIC for 90% of strains = 1 microgram/ml).

Citing Articles

Tulathromycin treatment does not affect bacterial dissemination or clearance of Brucella melitensis 16M following experimental infection of goats.

Boggiatto P, Olsen S PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0226242.

PMID: 31821358 PMC: 6903718. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226242.


In vitro synergistic activity of antibiotic combinations against Brucella melitensis using E-test methodology.

Kilic S, Dizbay M, Hizel K, Arman D Braz J Microbiol. 2013; 39(2):233-7.

PMID: 24031207 PMC: 3768412. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822008000200006.


In vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing of Brucella isolates from Egypt between 1999 and 2007 and evidence of probable rifampin resistance.

Abdel-Maksoud M, House B, Wasfy M, Abdel-Rahman B, Pimentel G, Roushdy G Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2012; 11:24.

PMID: 22929054 PMC: 3464789. DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-11-24.


Broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Brucella species: quality control limits for ten antimicrobial agents against three standard quality control strains.

Brown S, Traczewski M J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(11):5804-7.

PMID: 16272526 PMC: 1287786. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5804-5807.2005.


Use of aminoglycosides in treatment of infections due to intracellular bacteria.

Maurin M, Raoult D Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45(11):2977-86.

PMID: 11600345 PMC: 90771. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.2977-2986.2001.


References
1.
Easmon C, Crane J, Blowers A . Effect of ciprofloxacin on intracellular organisms: in-vitro and in-vivo studies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986; 18 Suppl D:43-8. DOI: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_d.43. View

2.
Pascual A, Tsukayama D, Kovarik J, Gekker G, Peterson P . Uptake and activity of rifapentine in human peritoneal macrophages and polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987; 6(2):152-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018197. View

3.
Garcia-Rodriguez J, Garcia-Sanchez J, Munoz Bellido J, Ortiz de la Tabla V, Bellido Barbero J . Review of pulmonary brucellosis: a case report on brucellar pulmonary empyema. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988; 11(1):53-60. DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(88)90073-9. View

4.
Colmenero Castillo J, Hernandez Marquez S, Reguera Iglesias J, Cabrera Franquelo F, Rius Diaz F, Alonso A . Comparative trial of doxycycline plus streptomycin versus doxycycline plus rifampin for the therapy of human brucellosis. Chemotherapy. 1989; 35(2):146-52. DOI: 10.1159/000238662. View

5.
Kirst H, Sides G . New directions for macrolide antibiotics: structural modifications and in vitro activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989; 33(9):1413-8. PMC: 172675. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.33.9.1413. View