» Articles » PMID: 8481586

Prevalence and Incidence of Vertebral Deformities

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 1993 May 1
PMID 8481586
Citations 131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a need to identify vertebral fractures from radiographs taken at a single point in time, but considerable controversy surrounds the methods to be used. We extended a data set to comprise baseline radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine on an age-stratified random sample of 762 Rochester, Minnesota, women and used revised methods to define vertebral deformities morphometrically. Changes in the method of measuring vertebral heights, changes in the source of normal values for vertebral measurements and changes in the criteria for assessing vertebral deformity had little impact on estimated prevalence and incidence in this population. The prevalence of any vertebral deformity was estimated at 25.3 per 100 Rochester women aged 50 years and over (95% CI, 22.3-28.2), while the incidence of a new deformity in this group was estimated at 17.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 16.0-19.7). Projected nationally, these data suggest that over 500,000 white women in the United States develop vertebral deformities for the first time each year and that over 7 million white women aged 50 years and over might be affected at any given time. These estimates are limited by the absence of a reliable 'gold standard' with which to determine false positive and false negative rates associated with this or any other morphometric method. Information on the health consequences of vertebral deformities of various sorts would be most helpful in choosing between alternative approaches to defining them.

Citing Articles

Impact of the FLS model on patients with major fracture in Gran Canaria: 2018-2022 experience.

Naranjo A, Sarmiento C, Molina A, Fuentes S, Caceres L, Ojeda S Arch Osteoporos. 2025; 20(1):35.

PMID: 40055248 PMC: 11889033. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-025-01514-7.


Fractures in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology, economic impact and ethnography (Fractures-E ): study protocol.

Burton A, Drew S, Cassim B, Jarjou L, Gooberman-Hill R, Noble S Wellcome Open Res. 2025; 8():261.

PMID: 39822313 PMC: 11736110. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19391.1.


Dual-Fluoroscopy vs. Single-Fluoroscopy in Balloon Kyphoplasty: A Study of Efficiency and Safety.

Romem R, Engel I, Segal D, Behrbalk R, Schleifer D, Koch J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518746 PMC: 11546755. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216608.


Vertebral fractures in patients with CKD and the general population: a call for diagnosis and action.

Gifre L, Masso E, Fusaro M, Haarhaus M, Urena P, Cozzolino M Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(8):sfae191.

PMID: 39099567 PMC: 11294886. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae191.


Finite element analysis of precise puncture vertebral augmentation in the treatment of different types of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Pan H, Li H, Liu T, Xiao C, Li S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):599.

PMID: 39080550 PMC: 11287837. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07735-0.


References
1.
Melton 3rd L, Kan S, Frye M, Wahner H, OFallon W, Riggs B . Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129(5):1000-11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115204. View

2.
Leske M, Ederer F, Podgor M . Estimating incidence from age-specific prevalence in glaucoma. Am J Epidemiol. 1981; 113(5):606-13. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113138. View

3.
Kurland L, Molgaard C . The patient record in epidemiology. Sci Am. 1981; 245(4):54-63. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1081-54. View

4.
GERSHON-COHEN J, RECHTMAN A, SCHRAER H, Blumberg N . Asymptomatic fractures in osteoporotic spines of the aged. J Am Med Assoc. 1953; 153(7):625-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1953.02940240017005. View

5.
Cooper C, Melton L . Vertebral fractures. BMJ. 1992; 304(6830):793-4. PMC: 1881670. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6830.793. View