» Articles » PMID: 8342071

Busulfan Disposition: the Role of Therapeutic Monitoring in Bone Marrow Transplantation Induction Regimens

Overview
Journal Semin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 1993 Aug 1
PMID 8342071
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High-dose busulfan is an important component of many bone marrow transplantation (BMT) preparative regimens. The dose-limiting toxicity of busulfan in BMT regimens is hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which occurs in approximately 20% to 40% of patients. We used a gas chromatography-electron capture detection assay and pharmacokinetic models to examine busulfan disposition in adults and children. Marked interpatient and intrapatient variability in busulfan disposition was observed in both patient populations. Part of the intrapatient variation appeared to be due to circadian changes in busulfan disposition. We also used gas chromatography-electron capture detection and pharmacokinetic models to assess whether excessive exposure to busulfan correlates with an increased risk of VOD. The area under the curve of time versus concentration (AUC) after the first dose of busulfan was measured in patients receiving a 16-dose course of busulfan as part of a BMT preparative regimen. In 27 patients who showed high AUCs (> 1,500 mumol.min/L) after the first dose, the fifth through 16th doses of busulfan were decreased. Patients with high AUCs who did not receive dose adjustments had a 75% incidence of VOD. The incidence of VOD was only 18% in patients with high AUCs whose dose was adjusted on the basis of therapeutic monitoring. 5% for those not needing adjustment. These studies suggest that therapeutic monitoring can play an important role in decreasing the toxicity of BMT preparative regimens. Therapeutic monitoring also may improve treatment efficacy by identifying patients who are not receiving adequate drug exposure.

Citing Articles

Metformin pretreatment ameliorates busulfan-induced liver endothelial toxicity during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Balakrishnan B, Stallon Illangeswaran R, Rajamani B, Arunachalam A, Pai A, Mohanan E PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0293311.

PMID: 37883349 PMC: 10602364. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293311.


Effects of combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy in exposure-directed busulfan.

Iemura T, Kondo T, Ueda A, Maeda T, Kitawaki T, Arai Y Ann Hematol. 2023; 102(10):2909-2922.

PMID: 37052663 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05209-2.


Conditioning Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Do Not Fit All: Adjusting BuCy2 in Mexico to Improve Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS).

Leon-Rodriguez E, Rivera-Franco M Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2023; 16(4):189-197.

PMID: 36883113 PMC: 9985810. DOI: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i4.10876.


Therapeutic drug monitoring for cytotoxic anticancer drugs: Principles and evidence-based practices.

Smita P, Narayan P, J K, Gaurav P Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1015200.

PMID: 36568145 PMC: 9773989. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1015200.


Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Ben Hassine K, Powys M, Svec P, Pozdechova M, Versluys B, Ansari M Front Pediatr. 2021; 9:775485.

PMID: 34956984 PMC: 8705537. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.775485.