» Articles » PMID: 31212080

A Phase II Multicenter Study of the Addition of Azacitidine to Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplant for High-Risk Myelodysplasia (and Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia): Results of CALGB 100801 (Alliance)

Abstract

Relapse remains the major cause of death in older patients transplanted for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission or for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at any age. Conventional myeloablative conditioning followed by allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation is associated with significantly less relapse compared with reduced-intensity conditioning when performed in younger patients with AML or MDS, but the toxicity of this approach in older patients is prohibitive. We hypothesized that pharmacokinetic targeting to optimize busulfan (BU) exposure, combined with the administration of azacitidine (AZA) post-transplant would mitigate the risk of relapse while reducing nonrelapse mortality and ultimately improve progression-free survival (PFS). On this phase II multicenter study, 63 patients (40 unrelated donors and 23 matched related donors) received a uniform conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine i.v. (days -7 to -3), BU targeted to a daily area under the curve (AUC) of 4000 μM/min (days -6 to -3) after the administration of a 25-mg/m i.v. test dose on 1 day between days -14 to -9, and antithymocyte globulin (days -6, -5, and -4 (2 doses for matched related donors and 3 for matched unrelated donors only). Beginning on days +42 to +90, all patients were planned to receive up to 6 monthly cycles of AZA at 32 mg/m subcutaneously for 5 days. The median age was 62 years (range, 44 to 74); 13 had AML and 50 had MDS; 87% of patients were within 20% of the target AUC based on a validation sample. Forty-one patients (65%) started AZA at a median of 61 days (range, 43 to 91) post-transplant, and 17 patients (41%) completed all 6 cycles of AZA. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was 33.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-45%). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% (95% CI, 15%-37%) at 2 years. With a median follow-up of 58.9 months, the estimated PFS probability at 2 years and 5 years after transplantation was 41.2% (80% CI, 33.9%-49.9%) and 26.9% (80% CI, 20.4%-35.5%), respectively, for the entire group with a median PFS of 15.8 months (95% CI, 6.7 to 28.3). The probability of overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 45.7% (95% CI, 34.9%-59.9%) and 31.2% (95% CI, 21.3% to 45.8%), respectively, for the entire group with a median overall survival of 19.2 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 37.5). In summary, we demonstrated the feasibility of a novel reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with test dose BU targeted to an AUC of 4000 μM/min. The feasibility of AZA in this setting appears to be limited if applied to an unselected population of older hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01168219.).

Citing Articles

Innovations in conditioning and post-transplant maintenance in AML: genomically informed revelations on the graft-versus-leukemia effect.

Murdock H, Ho V, Garcia J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1359113.

PMID: 38571944 PMC: 10987864. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359113.


Approaches to optimize outcomes in transplant recipients.

Mishra A Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023; 2023(1):723-730.

PMID: 38066935 PMC: 10727018. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000459.


Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Aged Over 60 Years.

Chaudhuri D, Khan K, Al Shouli R, Allakky A, Ferguson A, Khan A Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40124.

PMID: 37425516 PMC: 10329419. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40124.


Immunopathogenic mechanisms and modulatory approaches to graft-versus-host disease prevention in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Pang Y, Holtzman N Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2023; 36(2):101475.

PMID: 37353287 PMC: 10291443. DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101475.


Overcoming relapse: prophylactic or pre-emptive use of azacitidine or FLT3 inhibitors after allogeneic transplantation for AML or MDS.

Najima Y Int J Hematol. 2023; 118(2):169-182.

PMID: 37036626 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-023-03596-w.


References
1.
Lowenberg B, Ossenkoppele G, van Putten W, Schouten H, Graux C, Ferrant A . High-dose daunorubicin in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(13):1235-48. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901409. View

2.
de Lima M, Giralt S, Thall P, de Padua Silva L, Jones R, Komanduri K . Maintenance therapy with low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a dose and schedule finding study. Cancer. 2010; 116(23):5420-31. PMC: 5669059. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25500. View

3.
Soiffer R, Kim H, McGuirk J, Horwitz M, Johnston L, Patnaik M . Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Clinical Trial of Anti-T-Lymphocyte Globulin to Assess Impact on Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease-Free Survival in Patients Undergoing HLA-Matched Unrelated Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell.... J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(36):4003-4011. PMC: 8462523. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.8177. View

4.
Palmer J, McCune J, Perales M, Marks D, Bubalo J, Mohty M . Personalizing Busulfan-Based Conditioning: Considerations from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines Committee. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016; 22(11):1915-1925. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.07.013. View

5.
Barba P, Martino R, Zhou Q, Cho C, Castro-Malaspina H, Devlin S . CD34 Cell Selection versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Unmodified Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients Age >50 Years with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome . Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018; 24(5):964-972. PMC: 6800017. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.804. View