» Articles » PMID: 8316101

Knowing but Not Remembering: Adult Age Differences in Recollective Experience

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 1993 May 1
PMID 8316101
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Age differences in recollective experience were examined in two experiments in which younger and older adults used their self-generated associations as retrieval cues. When recalling an item, subjects indicated whether they consciously remembered its prior occurrence, or merely knew that it was presented previously. The results of both experiments showed that aging selectively impaired retention accompanied by recollective experience, as measured by remember responses, but had no effects in the absence of recollective experience, as measured by know responses. In Experiment 2, a similar pattern of data was obtained for a group of younger adults by increasing the rate of presentation at study. The results also indicated that judgments of recollective experience were related to type of encoding: Subjects who generated detailed associations reported higher levels of remember responses and lower levels of know responses than did subjects who generated fewer detailed associations. The results are discussed in terms of processes related to perceptual familiarity and contextual detail.

Citing Articles

Different definitions of the nonrecollection-based response option(s) change how people use the "remember" response in the remember/know paradigm.

Williams H, Lindsay D Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(7):1359-1374.

PMID: 31119498 PMC: 6800851. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00938-0.


The Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Recollection Success, Recollection-Related Cortical Reinstatement, and Post-Retrieval Monitoring.

Wang T, Johnson J, de Chastelaine M, Donley B, Rugg M Cereb Cortex. 2015; 26(4):1698-1714.

PMID: 25631058 PMC: 4785952. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu333.


Episodic memory and self-reference via semantic autobiographical memory: insights from an fMRI study in younger and older adults.

Kalenzaga S, Sperduti M, Anssens A, Martinelli P, Devauchelle A, Gallarda T Front Behav Neurosci. 2015; 8:449.

PMID: 25628546 PMC: 4292587. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00449.


Repetition of previously novel melodies sometimes increases both remember and know responses in recognition memory.

Gardiner J, Kaminska Z, Dixon M, Java R Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 3(3):366-71.

PMID: 24213939 DOI: 10.3758/BF03210762.


Recognition memory across the lifespan: the impact of word frequency and study-test interval on estimates of familiarity and recollection.

Meier B, Rey-Mermet A, Rothen N, Graf P Front Psychol. 2013; 4:787.

PMID: 24198796 PMC: 3812907. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00787.


References
1.
Puglisi J, Park D, Smith A, Dudley W . Age differences in encoding specificity. J Gerontol. 1988; 43(6):P145-50. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/43.6.p145. View

2.
Light L, Singh A, Capps J . Dissociation of memory and awareness in young and older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986; 8(1):62-74. DOI: 10.1080/01688638608401297. View

3.
Balota D, Duchek J . Age-related differences in lexical access, spreading activation, and simple pronunciation. Psychol Aging. 1988; 3(1):84-93. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.3.1.84. View

4.
Hultsch D, Masson M, Small B . Adult age differences in direct and indirect tests of memory. J Gerontol. 1991; 46(1):P22-30. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/46.1.p22. View

5.
Kausler D, Puckett J . Adult age differences in memory for sex of voice. J Gerontol. 1981; 36(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/36.1.44. View