» Articles » PMID: 25631058

The Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Recollection Success, Recollection-Related Cortical Reinstatement, and Post-Retrieval Monitoring

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Jan 30
PMID 25631058
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate whether age-related differences in episodic memory performance are accompanied by a reduction in the specificity of recollected information. We addressed this question by comparing recollection-related cortical reinstatement in young and older adults. At study, subjects viewed objects and concrete words, making 1 of 2 different semantic judgments depending on the study material. Test items were words that corresponded to studied words or the names of studied objects. Subjects indicated whether each test item was recollected, familiar, or novel. Reinstatement of information differentiating the encoding tasks was quantified both with a univariate analysis of the fMRI signal and with a multivoxel pattern analysis, using a classifier that had been trained to discriminate between the 2 classes of study episode. The results of these analyses converged to suggest that reinstatement did not differ according to age. Thus, there was no evidence that specificity of recollected information was reduced in older individuals. Additionally, there were no age effects in the magnitude of recollection-related modulations in regional activity or in the neural correlates of post-retrieval monitoring. Taken together, the findings suggest that the neural mechanisms engaged during successful episodic retrieval can remain stable with advancing age.

Citing Articles

Mnemonic But Not Contextual Feedback Signals Defy Dedifferentiation in the Aging Early Visual Cortex.

Ehrlich I, Ortiz-Tudela J, Tan Y, Muckli L, Lee Shing Y J Neurosci. 2024; 44(16).

PMID: 38395614 PMC: 11026335. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0607-23.2023.


Demands on perceptual and mnemonic fidelity are a key determinant of age-related cognitive decline throughout the lifespan.

Gellersen H, McMaster J, Abdurahman A, Simons J J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 153(1):200-223.

PMID: 38236240 PMC: 10795485. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001476.


Relationships between age, fMRI correlates of familiarity and familiarity-based memory performance under single and dual task conditions.

de Chastelaine M, Horne E, Hou M, Rugg M Neuropsychologia. 2023; 189:108670.

PMID: 37633516 PMC: 10591814. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108670.


Age differences in the neural correlates of recollection: transient versus sustained fMRI effects.

Hou M, de Chastelaine M, Rugg M Neurobiol Aging. 2023; 131:132-143.

PMID: 37633119 PMC: 10528128. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.07.001.


Age differences in neural distinctiveness during memory encoding, retrieval, and reinstatement.

Pauley C, Kobelt M, Werkle-Bergner M, Sander M Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(16):9489-9503.

PMID: 37365853 PMC: 10431749. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad219.


References
1.
Schacter D, Kaszniak A, Kihlstrom J, Valdiserri M . The relation between source memory and aging. Psychol Aging. 1991; 6(4):559-68. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.559. View

2.
Miller S, Celone K, DePeau K, Diamond E, Dickerson B, Rentz D . Age-related memory impairment associated with loss of parietal deactivation but preserved hippocampal activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(6):2181-6. PMC: 2538895. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706818105. View

3.
Hayama H, Rugg M . Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is engaged during post-retrieval processing of both episodic and semantic information. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(12):2409-16. PMC: 2712584. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.010. View

4.
Dulas M, Duarte A . The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: an ERP study. Brain Res. 2013; 1500:55-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.01.018. View

5.
Craik F, Bialystok E . Cognition through the lifespan: mechanisms of change. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(3):131-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.007. View