Powell C, Schlupp I
Behav Ecol. 2024; 35(2):arae008.
PMID: 39371452
PMC: 11453105.
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae008.
Rodriguez-Morales R
Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(4):e11286.
PMID: 38654714
PMC: 11036076.
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11286.
MacLaren R
PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0298171.
PMID: 38547203
PMC: 10977783.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298171.
Nobel S, Wang X, Talvard L, Tariel J, Lille M, Cucherousset J
Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1976):20220431.
PMID: 35703048
PMC: 9198774.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0431.
Muraco Jr J, Monroe D, Aspbury A, Gabor C
Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(3).
PMID: 33802259
PMC: 8001229.
DOI: 10.3390/biology10030186.
The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation: a review of mathematical models.
Fitzpatrick C, Servedio M
Curr Zool. 2018; 64(3):323-333.
PMID: 30402075
PMC: 6007321.
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy029.
No male mate choice for female boldness in a bi-parental West African cichlid, the rainbow krib ().
Scherer U, Schuett W
PeerJ. 2018; 6:e5373.
PMID: 30123707
PMC: 6087618.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5373.
Test of the Deception Hypothesis in Atlantic Mollies -Does the Audience Copy a Pretended Mate Choice of Others?.
Witte K, Baumgartner K, Rohrig C, Nobel S
Biology (Basel). 2018; 7(3).
PMID: 30011804
PMC: 6164261.
DOI: 10.3390/biology7030040.
Male size, not female preferences influence female reproductive success in a poeciliid fish (Poecilia latipinna): a combined behavioural/genetic approach.
Scherer U, Tiedemann R, Schlupp I
BMC Res Notes. 2018; 11(1):364.
PMID: 29884214
PMC: 5994011.
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3487-2.
Personality differentially affects individual mate choice decisions in female and male Western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).
Chen B, Liu K, Zhou L, Gomes-Silva G, Sommer-Trembo C, Plath M
PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197197.
PMID: 29763435
PMC: 5953439.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197197.
Predictability is attractive: Female preference for behaviourally consistent males but no preference for the level of male aggression in a bi-parental cichlid.
Scherer U, Kuhnhardt M, Schuett W
PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195766.
PMID: 29634757
PMC: 5892930.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195766.
Imitating the cost of males: A hypothesis for coexistence of all-female sperm-dependent species and their sexual host.
Leung C, Angers B
Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(1):266-272.
PMID: 29321869
PMC: 5756870.
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3681.
The gonadal transcriptome of the unisexual Amazon molly Poecilia formosa in comparison to its sexual ancestors, Poecilia mexicana and Poecilia latipinna.
Schedina I, Groth D, Schlupp I, Tiedemann R
BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):12.
PMID: 29298680
PMC: 5753479.
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4382-2.
Kin Recognition in a Clonal Fish, Poecilia formosa.
Makowicz A, Tiedemann R, Steele R, Schlupp I
PLoS One. 2016; 11(8):e0158442.
PMID: 27483372
PMC: 4970819.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158442.
Social Memory Formation Rapidly and Differentially Affects the Motivation and Performance of Vocal Communication Signals in the Bengalese Finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica).
Toccalino D, Sun H, Sakata J
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016; 10:113.
PMID: 27378868
PMC: 4906024.
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00113.
Mate Choice Drives Evolutionary Stability in a Hybrid Complex.
Morgado-Santos M, Pereira H, Vicente L, Collares-Pereira M
PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0132760.
PMID: 26181664
PMC: 4504517.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132760.
On the evolutionary origins of differences in sexual preferences.
Ryabko D, Reznikova Z
Front Psychol. 2015; 6:628.
PMID: 26052290
PMC: 4439540.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00628.
When to approach novel prey cues? Social learning strategies in frog-eating bats.
Jones P, Ryan M, Flores V, Page R
Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1772):20132330.
PMID: 24266035
PMC: 3813345.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2330.
Public information influences sperm transfer to females in sailfin molly males.
Nobel S, Witte K
PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e53865.
PMID: 23342021
PMC: 3547040.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053865.
Homosexual behaviour increases male attractiveness to females.
Bierbach D, Jung C, Hornung S, Streit B, Plath M
Biol Lett. 2012; 9(1):20121038.
PMID: 23234866
PMC: 3565526.
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1038.