» Articles » PMID: 8227574

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast After Limited Surgery and Radiation Therapy

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 1993 Nov 1
PMID 8227574
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Posttherapeutic changes in the breast after tumorectomy (TE) and radiation therapy (RT) may mimic or obscure recurrent or new malignancies and thus interfere with conventional diagnostic studies. We investigated the enhancement of tissue during variable time intervals after therapy with contrast-enhanced MRI in 62 patients.

Materials And Methods: We report the results of 77 studies in 62 patients undergoing TE and RT. We include only those studies with at least 24 months of clinical and mammographic follow-up (n = 60) or histopathologic results (n = 17).

Results: Up to 9 months after therapy, differentiation between posttherapeutic changes and recurrence was frequently impossible because of the strong enhancement. Ten to 18 months after therapy, this posttherapeutic enhancement subsided slowly with some interindividual variations. After 18 months posttherapy, no significant enhancement was encountered in 30 of 32 cases. Diffuse or focal enhancement was present in all recurrent tumors and all recurrences were correctly diagnosed. Furthermore, 4 of 11 recurrences and 10 of 18 single recurrent foci were detected by MR alone, based on focal enhancement.

Conclusion: Accordingly, contrast-enhanced MR is not recommended during the first 9 months after therapy. Nine to 18 months after therapy, it may be helpful in those two-thirds of cases where the scar does not enhance. If enhancement takes place (one-third of cases), it may represent either scar or tumor, and in such circumstances, enhanced MR is of no value. After 18 months, enhanced MRI has proven a valuable additional tool. By correctly detecting or excluding recurrent tumor, it can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy.

Citing Articles

Fat necrosis: A consultant's conundrum.

Majithia J, Haria P, Popat P, Katdare A, Chouhan S, Gala K Front Oncol. 2023; 12:926396.

PMID: 36873302 PMC: 9978799. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926396.


Breast lesions with high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images.

Durur-Subasi I, Durur-Karakaya A, Alper F, Karaman A, Kilic R, Sipal S Jpn J Radiol. 2013; 31(10):653-61.

PMID: 23990366 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-013-0239-z.


Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast.

Jansen S, Lin V, Giger M, Li H, Karczmar G, Newstead G Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(7):1374-82.

PMID: 21327872 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2080-z.


FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.

Pan L, Han Y, Sun X, Liu J, Gang H J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010; 136(7):1007-22.

PMID: 20091186 PMC: 2874488. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-009-0746-6.


Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Mann R, Kuhl C, Kinkel K, Boetes C Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7):1307-18.

PMID: 18389253 PMC: 2441490. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7.