» Articles » PMID: 10050940

Retrospective Analysis for Evaluation of the Value of Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients Treated with Breast Conservative Therapy

Overview
Journal MAGMA
Publisher Springer
Date 1999 Mar 2
PMID 10050940
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the value of contrast-enhanced (c.-e.) MRI in the follow-up of patients with conservatively treated breast cancer since detection and exclusion of malignancy may interfere significantly with posttherapeutic changes within the treated breast.

Material And Methods: A total of 207 patients with a history of limited surgery and radiation therapy underwent MR imaging, 40 patients were examined 0-12 months and 167 patients were examined later than 12 months after radiotherapy. Suspicious or indeterminate findings were suggested by clinical examination or conventional imaging in 80 studies. In 127 women, MRI was performed within breast tissue that was difficult to assess due to scarring or dense breast tissue.

Results: Recurrent carcinoma was confirmed in 27 patients by surgical biopsy. All 27 carcinomas, except for one with a slow signal increase, demonstrated early rise of signal intensity on dynamic T1-weighted contrast enhanced images. During the first year after therapy, the diagnostic accuracy could not be improved by additional use of c.-e. MRI. Differentiation between posttherapeutic changes and recurrent carcinoma was frequently not possible because of strong and sometimes early and ill-circumscribed enhancement. Later than 12 months after therapy enhancement decreased significantly, thus the false positive calls could be reduced from 49 (conventional imaging) to 12 (conventional imaging plus MRI). A total of 12 of 26 recurrences and multifocality in 4/5 cases were diagnosed by MR imaging alone at this time interval.

Conclusion: In the first year after therapy, c.-e. MRI is only indicated in selected cases. The results later than 12 months emphasize that c.-e. MRI may contribute significant additional information. It allows better distinction of posttherapeutic fibrosis from recurrent carcinoma and proved to be able to detect recurrent disease more sensitive and at an earlier stage.

Citing Articles

Usefulness of postoperative surveillance MR for women after breast-conservation therapy: Focusing on MR features of early and late recurrent breast cancer.

Lee J, Kang B, Kim S PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252476.

PMID: 34115797 PMC: 8195350. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252476.


Surveillance for second breast cancer events in women with a personal history of breast cancer using breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haas C, Nekhlyudov L, Lee J, Javid S, Bush M, Johnson D Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 181(2):255-268.

PMID: 32303988 PMC: 7262783. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05637-y.


Intraoperative Supine Breast MR Imaging to Quantify Tumor Deformation and Detection of Residual Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results.

Gombos E, Jayender J, Richman D, Caragacianu D, Mallory M, Jolesz F Radiology. 2016; 281(3):720-729.

PMID: 27332738 PMC: 5118055. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151472.


Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Yoon J, Kim M, Kim E, Moon H Korean J Radiol. 2015; 16(2):219-28.

PMID: 25741186 PMC: 4347260. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.219.


Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Mann R, Kuhl C, Kinkel K, Boetes C Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7):1307-18.

PMID: 18389253 PMC: 2441490. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7.


References
1.
Stomper P, Recht A, BERENBERG A, Jochelson M, Harris J . Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 148(1):39-43. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.1.39. View

2.
Braw M, Erlandsson I, Ewers S, Samuelsson L . Mammographic follow-up after breast conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy without boost irradiation for mammary carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 1991; 32(5):398-402. View

3.
Dao T, Rahmouni A, Campana F, Laurent M, Asselain B, Fourquet A . Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1993; 187(3):751-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497625. View

4.
Orel S . High-resolution MR imaging of the breast. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1996; 17(5):476-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(96)90032-3. View

5.
Fisher B, Redmond C, POISSON R, MARGOLESE R, Wolmark N, Wickerham L . Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320(13):822-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198903303201302. View