» Articles » PMID: 8154270

Early Failures Among 14,009 Cemented and 1,326 Uncemented Prostheses for Primary Coxarthrosis. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-1992

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1994 Feb 1
PMID 8154270
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 15,335 primary total hip replacements (THR) in patients with primary arthrosis were followed for 0-5.4 years. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of cumulative failure (revision) after 4.5 years was 2.7 percent for cemented THR, compared to 6.5 percent for uncemented. In patients under 65 years the cumulative revisions for cemented and uncemented THR were 3.3 and 7.9 percent. For the acetabular components, the cumulative failures were 0.6 percent for cemented and 1.7 percent for uncemented, and for femoral components 1.7 and 3.9 percent after 4.5 years. Adjusting for age and sex using a Cox regression model, 2 times higher rates of failure were found comparing uncemented to cemented THR. The results for uncemented prostheses were more unfavorable in young patients. In men and women under 60, the revision rates were increased 6 and 3 times, respectively, for patients with uncemented THR compared to those with cemented THR. Restriction of the end-point to revision for aseptic loosening gave results similar to the over-all results. No difference between cemented and uncemented THR was seen for revisions due to infection, whereas the most unfavorable results for uncemented THR were seen when revisions due to causes other than infection and aseptic loosening were considered.

Citing Articles

Calibration of Aseptic Loosening Simulation for Coatings Osteoinductive Effect.

Baroni S, Oliviero S, Amedeo La Mattina A, Maglio M, Martini L, Fini M Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(1):34-47.

PMID: 39120770 PMC: 11782331. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03588-9.


A comparison of the minimum data sets for primary shoulder arthroplasty between national shoulder arthroplasty registries. Is international harmonization feasible?.

Aveledo R, Holland P, Thomas M, Ashton F, Rangan A Shoulder Elbow. 2019; 11(2 Suppl):48-55.

PMID: 31447945 PMC: 6688150. DOI: 10.1177/1758573218755569.


Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future.

Varnum C, Pedersen A, Rolfson O, Rogmark C, Furnes O, Hallan G EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4(6):368-376.

PMID: 31210974 PMC: 6549115. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180091.


Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty.

Dy C, Bozic K, Pan T, Wright T, Padgett D, Lyman S Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013; 66(6):907-15.

PMID: 24285406 PMC: 4269321. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22240.


A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo: a preliminary study.

Reis J, Frias C, Canto e Castro C, Botelho M, Marques A, Simoes J J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012; 2012:613403.

PMID: 22701304 PMC: 3369535. DOI: 10.1155/2012/613403.