» Articles » PMID: 8150963

Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Broth Dilution Susceptibility Testing of Fluconazole Against Candida Albicans

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1994 Feb 1
PMID 8150963
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A comparative evaluation of methods for broth macro- and microdilution susceptibility testing of fluconazole was conducted with 119 clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Macro- and microdilution testing were performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations. For reference macrodilution testing, an 80% inhibition endpoint (MIC 80%) was determined after 48 h of incubation in accordance with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards proposed standard M27-P. Microdilution endpoints were scored as the first tube or well in which a prominent reduction in turbidity (score 2 out of a possible 4) was observed compared with the growth control (Micro MIC-2). Alternative endpoint criteria were assessed independently of the reference MIC 80% and Micro MIC-2 values and included a colorimetric microdilution endpoint determined by using an oxidation-reduction indicator (Alamar Blue; Alamar Bio-sciences Inc., Sacramento, Calif.). The MICs for the two microdilution test systems were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation. The percentage of fluconazole MICs within 2 doubling dilutions of the macrodilution reference values was 94% for both microdilution tests read at 24 h. Agreement was slightly lower at 48 h and ranged from 91 to 93%. Comparison of Micro MIC-2 and colorimetric microdilution MICs resulted in agreements of 97 and 93% at 24 and 48 h, respectively. These results show excellent agreement among alternative methods for fluconazole susceptibility testing.

Citing Articles

Optimization of a rapid, sensitive, and high throughput molecular sensor to measure canola protoplast respiratory metabolism as a means of screening nanomaterial cytotoxicity.

Osmani Z, Islam M, Wang F, Meira S, Kulka M Plant Methods. 2024; 20(1):165.

PMID: 39472941 PMC: 11523603. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-024-01289-x.


Screening sensibility and antifungal activity after topical application of a synthetic lactoferrin-derived antimicrobial peptide.

Brouwer C, Boekhout T, Alwasel S, Rahman M, Janga R, Welling M Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(2):669-680.

PMID: 38463589 PMC: 10918136.


Revisiting the Resazurin-Based Sensing of Cellular Viability: Widening the Application Horizon.

Lavogina D, Lust H, Tahk M, Laasfeld T, Vellama H, Nasirova N Biosensors (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35448256 PMC: 9032648. DOI: 10.3390/bios12040196.


A Proteomic Landscape of Candida albicans in the Stepwise Evolution to Fluconazole Resistance.

Song N, Zhou X, Li D, Li X, Liu W Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022; 66(4):e0210521.

PMID: 35343782 PMC: 9017357. DOI: 10.1128/aac.02105-21.


Can We Improve Antifungal Susceptibility Testing?.

Durand C, Maubon D, Cornet M, Wang Y, Aldebert D, Garnaud C Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11:720609.

PMID: 34568095 PMC: 8461061. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.720609.


References
1.
Calhoun D, Roberts G, Galgiani J, Bennett J, Feingold D, Jorgensen J . Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 23(2):298-301. PMC: 268630. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.298-301.1986. View

2.
Doern G, Tubert T, Chapin K, Rinaldi M . Effect of medium composition on results of macrobroth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 24(4):507-11. PMC: 268960. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.507-511.1986. View

3.
Galgiani J, Reiser J, Brass C, Espinel-Ingroff A, Gordon M, Kerkering T . Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31(9):1343-7. PMC: 174939. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.9.1343. View

4.
Galgiani J . Antifungal susceptibility tests. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987; 31(12):1867-70. PMC: 175816. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.12.1867. View

5.
Pfaller M, Burmeister L, Bartlett M, Rinaldi M . Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1988; 26(8):1437-41. PMC: 266638. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988. View