» Articles » PMID: 1452697

Collaborative Comparison of Broth Macrodilution and Microdilution Antifungal Susceptibility Tests

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1992 Dec 11
PMID 1452697
Citations 102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A collaborative comparison of macro- and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests was performed in five laboratories. MICs of amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, and ketoconazole were determined in all five centers against 95 coded isolates of Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Torulopsis glabrata. A standard protocol with the following National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing recommendations was used: an inoculum standardized by spectrophotometer, buffered (RPMI 1640) medium (pH 7.0), incubation at 35 degrees C, and an additive drug dilution procedure. Two inoculum sizes were tested (1 x 10(4) to 5 x 10(3) to 2.5 x 10(3) CFU/ml) and three scoring criteria were evaluated for MIC endpoint determinations, which were scored as 0 (optically clear), < or = 1 (slightly hazy turbidity), and < or = 2 (prominent decrease in turbidity compared with that of the growth control). Overall intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility was optimal with the low-density inoculum, the second-day readings, and MICs scored as either 1 or 2. The microdilution MICs demonstrated interlaboratory agreement with most of the four drugs higher than or similar to that of the macrodilution MICs. In general, there was good interlaboratory agreement with amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine; ketoconazole gave more variable results.

Citing Articles

Multilocus Sequence Typing and Antifungal Susceptibility of Isolates From Milk and Genital Tract of Dromedary Camel.

Fayez M, Swelum A, Alharbi N, Alrokban A, Almubarak A, Almubarak A Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:905962.

PMID: 35873700 PMC: 9305711. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.905962.


Factors influencing susceptibility testing of antifungal drugs: a critical review of document M27-A4 from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).

de Sousa E, Cortez A, de Souza Carvalho Melhem M, Frickmann H, de Souza J Braz J Microbiol. 2020; 51(4):1791-1800.

PMID: 32757139 PMC: 7688838. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-020-00354-6.


T-Bet Expression Mediated by the mTOR Pathway Influences CD4 T Cell Count in Mice With Lethal Sepsis.

Bai G, Wang H, Han W, Cui N Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:835.

PMID: 32431684 PMC: 7214724. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00835.


Antifungal peptides produced by actinomycetes and their biological activities against plant diseases.

Zhang D, Lu Y, Chen H, Wu C, Zhang H, Chen L J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2020; 73(5):265-282.

PMID: 32123311 DOI: 10.1038/s41429-020-0287-4.


Plasticity of Candida albicans Biofilms.

Soll D, Daniels K Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016; 80(3):565-95.

PMID: 27250770 PMC: 4981664. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00068-15.


References
1.
Coleman T, Madassery J, Kobayashi G, Nahm M, Little J . New fluorescence assay for the quantitation of fungi. J Clin Microbiol. 1989; 27(9):2003-7. PMC: 267727. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2003-2007.1989. View

2.
Eng C, Valenstein P . Standardization of yeast inocula with an electronic impedance counter. J Clin Microbiol. 1989; 27(10):2397-9. PMC: 267037. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2397-2399.1989. View

3.
Wey S, Mori M, Pfaller M, Woolson R, Wenzel R . Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Arch Intern Med. 1988; 148(12):2642-5. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.148.12.2642. View

4.
Doern G, Tubert T, Chapin K, Rinaldi M . Effect of medium composition on results of macrobroth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 24(4):507-11. PMC: 268960. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.507-511.1986. View

5.
Radetsky M, WHEELER R, Roe M, TODD J . Microtiter broth dilution method for yeast susceptibility testing with validation by clinical outcome. J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 24(4):600-6. PMC: 268979. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.600-606.1986. View