» Articles » PMID: 8119001

Porous-coated Total Hip Replacement

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8119001
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fifteen years of clinical experience with porous-coated prostheses demonstrated the durability of this type of fixation. This experience was documented by clinical follow-up study of the 393 cases treated by the senior author before 1985. Only six of these femoral components have been revised: three for loosening, two for stem breakage, and one for infection. Thus, the revision rate for the porous-coated stems was 1.5%. Porous-coated acetabular components were used in 227 of the arthroplasties. Five of these porous-coated cups have been revised: four for malposition leading to dislocation and one for late loosening secondary to osteolysis. Thus, the revision rate for these porous-coated acetabular components was 2.2%. Twenty bipolar and 146 cemented acetabular components were used in the remaining 166 cases treated before 1985. Eleven (7.5%) of the cemented acetabular components were revised. Revisions of the porous-coated components were rare in the first ten postoperative years. The clinical data were supplemented with analysis of postmortem specimens from 15 patients. Mechanical testing of the femoral specimens showed the relative micromotion at the porous surface to be exceptionally small (less than 40 microns). Seven of these postmortem retrievals involved cases with unilateral arthroplasties. In these cases, the contralateral normal femur also was removed, and a prosthesis identical to that in the in vivo implanted side was inserted to simulate the immediate postoperative condition. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the seven paired femora demonstrated that bone remodeling can be expected to produce a 5%-52% loss of periprosthetic bone mineral content, with the greatest loss occurring in the more osteoporotic patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Extra-small Femoral Stems in Extremely Hypoplastic Femurs: A Case-Series Study.

Ko Y, Kang S, Kim H, Yoo J Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(4):526-532.

PMID: 39092305 PMC: 11262947. DOI: 10.4055/cios23377.


Outcome and complication rate of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than twenty years: which bearing surface should be used?.

Kang S, Ko Y, Kim H, Yoo J Int Orthop. 2024; 48(6):1381-1390.

PMID: 38217722 PMC: 11076316. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06086-0.


Ceramic-on-Ceramic or Metal-on-Polyethylene: The Bearing of Choice after Ceramic Component Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty along with Concise Follow-Up of the Previous Cohort.

Kim H, Lee H, Lee S, Yoo J Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(11):2864-2871.

PMID: 37749775 PMC: 10622264. DOI: 10.1111/os.13889.


Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing.

Lee Y, Ha Y, Won S, Kim J, Park J, Koo K Clin Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(1):20-26.

PMID: 36778987 PMC: 9880509. DOI: 10.4055/cios21192.


Mid-term outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in 106 Crowe II/III hips: different hip center positions.

Jia C, Pan H, Wu Y, You Y, Cao S, Zhang X Eur J Med Res. 2022; 27(1):282.

PMID: 36494873 PMC: 9733288. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00936-0.