» Articles » PMID: 8020205

Percutaneous Diagnostic Stabilization for Low Back Pain. Correlation with Results After Fusion Operations

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1994 Jul 1
PMID 8020205
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diagnostic external fixation was performed in 101 patients with disabling low back pain. In 47 patients, pain was relieved by stabilization but returned after destabilization. These patients were considered good candidates for a fusion operation. Results after fusion are available for 34 patients: 14 (41%) patients had a good, 12 (35%) had a fair, and 8 (14%) had a bad result. In two patients, pain was relieved by stabilization and did not return after fixator removal; no fusion operation was performed. Fifty-two patients did not respond positively to external fixation. Nine were operated on despite negative results with fixation. Of these, seven patients had a bad result, one a good result (however, this patient had spinal stenosis and the indication for external fixation was wrong), and, in one, the follow-up time is too short. Positive results with external skeletal fixation may predict a successful fusion operation with reasonable accuracy. If stabilization does not relieve the patient's pain, spinal fusion is unlikely to be of any benefit.

Citing Articles

Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws.

Sadrameli S, Jafrani R, Staub B, Radaideh M, Holman P Int J Spine Surg. 2019; 12(6):650-658.

PMID: 30619667 PMC: 6314338. DOI: 10.14444/5081.


Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective trial.

Heintel T, Berglehner A, Meffert R Eur Spine J. 2012; 22(3):495-502.

PMID: 22903200 PMC: 3585653. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2476-8.


The value of a pantaloon cast test in surgical decision making for chronic low back pain patients: a systematic review of the literature supplemented with a prospective cohort study.

Willems P, Elmans L, Anderson P, Jacobs W, van der Schaaf D, de Kleuver M Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(10):1487-94.

PMID: 16705433 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0121-0.


Three-dimensional stabilization provided by the external spinal fixator compared to two internal fixation devices: a biomechanical in vitro flexibility study.

Lund T, Nydegger T, Rathonyi G, Nolte L, Schlenzka D, Oxland T Eur Spine J. 2003; 12(5):474-9.

PMID: 14618386 PMC: 3468006. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0519-2.


Temporary external fixation for low back pain: is it worth doing?.

Faraj A, Akasha K, Mulholland R Eur Spine J. 1997; 6(3):187-90.

PMID: 9258637 PMC: 3454615. DOI: 10.1007/BF01301434.