» Articles » PMID: 7961330

Tactile Defensiveness in Children with Developmental Disabilities: Responsiveness and Habituation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 1994 Aug 1
PMID 7961330
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tactile defensiveness (TD) is characterized by behaviors such as rubbing, scratching, negative expressions, withdrawal, or avoidance in response to tactile stimulation. An inhibition deficit has been implied in the literature and is the focus of this study. School-aged children with developmental disabilities were first assessed for level of TD using three measures. Later, the children were presented with a repeated tactile stimulus while engaged in a computer game. Intensity, duration, and latency of the responses were recorded on each trial. It was hypothesized that higher levels of TD would be associated with (a) greater responsiveness and (b) slower habituation rates to the tactile stimulus. Correlations of three separate TD measures and a series of 3 x 10 (Level of TD by Responsiveness across trials) repeated measures ANOVAs were used to test the two hypotheses. Children who demonstrated higher levels of TD on some of the preliminary measures also showed higher responsiveness in the experimental situation. There was no general habituation effect, and the limited group by trials interactions were not interpretable. We conclude that there is evidence for a differential sensitivity in TD, but not an inhibition deficit. Another significant finding included a negative correlation between TD and developmental age.

Citing Articles

Differences in temporal profile of brain responses by pleasantness of somatosensory stimulation in autistic individuals.

Zoltowski A, Failla M, Quinde-Zlibut J, Dunham-Carr K, Moana-Filho E, Essick G Somatosens Mot Res. 2023; 42(1):1-16.

PMID: 38140831 PMC: 11193842. DOI: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2294715.


Touch and olfaction/taste differentiate children carrying a 16p11.2 deletion from children with ASD.

Osorio J, Rodriguez-Herreros B, Romascano D, Junod V, Habegger A, Pain A Mol Autism. 2021; 12(1):8.

PMID: 33546725 PMC: 7863523. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-020-00410-w.


MEG-PLAN: a clinical and technical protocol for obtaining magnetoencephalography data in minimally verbal or nonverbal children who have autism spectrum disorder.

Kuschner E, Kim M, Bloy L, DiPiero M, Edgar J, Roberts T J Neurodev Disord. 2021; 13(1):8.

PMID: 33485311 PMC: 7827989. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-020-09350-1.


Increased pain sensitivity and pain-related anxiety in individuals with autism.

Failla M, Gerdes M, Williams Z, Moore D, Cascio C Pain Rep. 2020; 5(6):e861.

PMID: 33235944 PMC: 7676593. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000861.


Elevated Thresholds for Light Touch in Children With Autism Reflect More Conservative Perceptual Decision-Making Rather Than a Sensory Deficit.

Quinde-Zlibut J, Okitondo C, Williams Z, Weitlauf A, Mash L, Heflin B Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:122.

PMID: 32317953 PMC: 7154145. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00122.


References
1.
Baranek G, Berkson G . Tactile defensiveness in children with developmental disabilities: responsiveness and habituation. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994; 24(4):457-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF02172128. View

2.
Ayres A, Tickle L . Hyper-responsivity to touch and vestibular stimuli as a predictor of positive response to sensory integration procedures by autistic children. Am J Occup Ther. 1980; 34(6):375-81. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.34.6.375. View

3.
Larson K . The sensory history of developmentally delayed children with and without tactile defensiveness. Am J Occup Ther. 1982; 36(9):590-6. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.36.9.590. View

4.
Ritvo E, Ornitz E, La Fanchi S . Frequency of repetitive behaviors in early infantile autism and its variants. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1968; 19(3):341-7. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1968.01740090085008. View

5.
Royeen C . Domain specifications of the construct tactile defensiveness. Am J Occup Ther. 1985; 39(9):596-9. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.39.9.596. View