A Community Ability Scale for Chronically Mentally Ill Consumers: Part I. Reliability and Validity

Overview

Journal Community Ment Health J

Specialty Health Services

Date 1994 Aug 1

PMID 7956112

Citations 77

Authors

S Barker

N Barron

B H McFarland

D A Bigelow

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The authors describe the development, reliability testing, and validation of a 17-item instrument that measures the level of functioning of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers. The instrument provides a measure of the consumer's severity of disability which can, in turn, be used to: (a) describe an agency's "case mix" of clients; (b) measure consumer progress; (c) assign clients to different levels of service; and (d) assist payors in determining reimbursement. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is aimed specifically at persons with chronic mental illness, is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population, and is quick and easy to complete. The scale's reliability and validity have been examined in detail. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability are good. Criterion variables such as length of psychiatric hospitalization and clinicians' global ratings correlated highly with scale scores. Finally, the instrument predicts subsequent state and local hospital admissions.

Citing Articles

Systematic review and meta-analysis of early visual processing, social cognition, and functional outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Ganse-Dumrath A, Chohan A, Samuel S, Bretherton P, Haenschel C, Fett A Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025; 40:100351.

PMID: 40028174 PMC: 11872129. DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100351.

Transdiagnostic modeling of clinician-rated symptoms in affective and nonaffective psychotic disorders.

Chung Y, Girard J, Ravichandran C, Ongur D, Cohen B, Baker J J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024; 134(1):81-96.

PMID: 39446623 PMC: 11747831. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000958.

Using Computational Phenotyping to Identify Divergent Strategies for Effort Allocation Across the Psychosis Spectrum.

Whitton A, Cooper J, Merchant J, Treadway M, Lewandowski K Schizophr Bull. 2024; 50(5):1127-1136.

PMID: 38498838 PMC: 11348999. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae024.

Effectiveness of Interventions for Meaningful Activity Participation in Homelessness: A Systematic Review.

Marshall C, Easton C, Javadizadeh E, Holmes J, Phillips B, Isard R Can J Occup Ther. 2024; 91(3):256-271.

PMID: 38436121 PMC: 11470713. DOI: 10.1177/00084174241233519.

Subfield-specific longitudinal changes of hippocampal volumes in patients with early-stage bipolar disorder.

Atwood B, Yassin W, Chan S, Hall M Bipolar Disord. 2023; 25(4):301-311.

PMID: 36855850 PMC: 10330583. DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13315.

References

Ellis R, Wilson N, FOSTER F . Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: the Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR). Community Ment Health J. 1984; 20(1):72-89. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754105. View

Bachrach L . Measuring program outcomes in Tucson. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987; 38(11):1151-2. DOI: 10.1176/ps.38.11.1151. View

Dworkin R, Friedman L, Telschow R, Grant K, Moffic H, Sloan V . The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situations. Community Ment Health J. 1990; 26(4):335-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF00752724. View

Bartko J . Measurement and reliability: statistical thinking considerations. Schizophr Bull. 1991; 17(3):483-9. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/17.3.483. View

Horn S, Chambers A, Sharkey P, Horn R . Psychiatric severity of illness. A case mix study. Med Care. 1989; 27(1):69-84. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198901000-00007. View

Freiman M . Hospital financial performance under the prospective payment system by type of admission: psychiatric versus medical/surgical. Health Serv Res. 1990; 25(5):785-808. PMC: 1065664. View

Kramer H, Massey O, Pokorny L . Development and validation of a level-of-care instrument for predicting residential placement. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990; 41(4):407-12. DOI: 10.1176/ps.41.4.407. View

Ware Jr J . Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(6):473-80. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90003-8. View

Green R, Gracely E . Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally ill. Community Ment Health J. 1987; 23(2):91-102. DOI: 10.1007/BF00757163. View

10.

Kuhlman T, Sincaban V, Bernstein M . Team use of the Global Assessment Scale for inpatient planning and evaluation. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990; 41(4):416-9. DOI: 10.1176/ps.41.4.416. View

11.

Susser M . Disease, illness, sickness; impairment, disability and handicap. Psychol Med. 1990; 20(3):471-3. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700016974. View

12.

Mulkern V, Manderscheid R . Characteristics of community support program clients in 1980 and 1984. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989; 40(2):165-72. DOI: 10.1176/ps.40.2.165. View

13.

Brekke J . An examination of the relationships among three outcome scales in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992; 180(3):162-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199203000-00003. View

14.

Spitzer W . State of science 1986: quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(6):465-71. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90002-6. View

15.

Wood W, Beardmore D . Prospective payment for outpatient mental health services: evaluation of diagnosis-related groups. Community Ment Health J. 1986; 22(4):286-93. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754382. View

16.

Stahler G, Rappaport H . Do therapists bias their ratings of patient functioning under peer review?. Community Ment Health J. 1986; 22(4):265-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754380. View

17.

Berren M . Statewide outcome evaluation: an introduction to the special issue. Community Ment Health J. 1984; 20(1):4-13. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754100. View

18.

MCPHEETERS H . Statewide mental health outcome evaluation: a perspective of two southern states. Community Ment Health J. 1984; 20(1):44-55. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754103. View

19.

OWEN W . Analysis and aggregation of CMHC outcome data in a statewide evaluation system: a case report. Community Ment Health J. 1984; 20(1):27-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754102. View

20.

Anthony W, Kennard W, OBrien W, Forbess R . Psychiatric rehabilitation: past myths and current realities. Community Ment Health J. 1986; 22(4):249-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00754379. View