» Articles » PMID: 31427856

Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Aug 21
PMID 31427856
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As mental health care transitions from facility-based care to community-based services, methods to classify patients in terms of their expected health care resource use are an essential tool to balance the health care needs and equitable allocation of health care resources. This study performed a scoping review to summarize the nature, extent, and range of research on case-mix classifications used to predict mental health care resource use in community settings. This study identified 17 eligible studies with 32 case-mix classification systems published since the 1980s. Most of these studies came from the USA Veterans Affairs and Medicare systems, and the most recent studies came from Australia. There were a wide variety of choices of input variables and measures of resource use. However, much of the variance in observed resource use was not accounted for by these case-mix systems. The research activity specific to case-mix classification for community mental health care was modest. More consideration should be given to the appropriateness of the input variables, resource use measure, and evaluation of predictive performance. Future research should take advantage of testing case-mix systems developed in other settings for community mental health care settings, if possible.

Citing Articles

New South Wales alcohol and other drug service providers' perceptions of the relative importance of client variables for determining treatment need.

Larance B, Ingram I, Haynes C, Buckfield L, Goh C, Kelly P Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024; 44(1):195-225.

PMID: 39433473 PMC: 11743210. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13952.


Predictors of amounts of child and adolescent mental health service use.

Edbrooke-Childs J, Rashid A, Ritchie B, Deighton J Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022; 32(11):2335-2342.

PMID: 36114311 PMC: 10576665. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-02063-x.


A Case-Mix System for Children and Youth With Developmental Disabilities.

Stewart S, Celebre A, Head M, James M, Martin L, Fries B Health Serv Insights. 2021; 13:1178632920977899.

PMID: 33414639 PMC: 7750751. DOI: 10.1177/1178632920977899.


The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care.

Hirdes J, Everdingen C, Ferris J, Franco-Martin M, Fries B, Heikkila J Front Psychiatry. 2020; 10:926.

PMID: 32076412 PMC: 6978285. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00926.

References
1.
Jones J, Amaddeo F, Barbui C, Tansella M . Predicting costs of mental health care: a critical literature review. Psychol Med. 2007; 37(4):467-77. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291706009676. View

2.
Grob G . Community Mental Health Policy in America: Lessons Learned. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2017; 53(1):6-13. View

3.
Weiner J, Starfield B, Steinwachs D, Mumford L . Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Med Care. 1991; 29(5):452-72. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199105000-00006. View

4.
Rosen A, Loveland S, Anderson J, Hankin C, Breckenridge J, Berlowitz D . Diagnostic cost groups (DCGs) and concurrent utilization among patients with substance abuse disorders. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37(4):1079-103. PMC: 1464011. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.67.x. View

5.
Barker S, Barron N, McFarland B, Bigelow D . A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validity. Community Ment Health J. 1994; 30(4):363-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF02207489. View