» Articles » PMID: 7785996

Effect of Testing Method on Apparent Activities of Antiviral Disinfectants and Antiseptics

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1995 Apr 1
PMID 7785996
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the independent effects of various test methods on the activities of antiviral chemical germicides. The activities of germicides against MS2 and phi 6 bacteriophages in a new porcine tissue carrier model were compared to those obtained by four other methods (suspension, glass carrier, tile carrier, and fingerpad tissue carrier tests). After a 1-min contact followed by neutralization (and elution off the carriers), the residual virus in the treated samples was quantified and the amount was compared with that in the saline controls. Antiviral activity was highly dependent on the test method for both viruses and was always greatest in suspension tests and lowest in tissue carrier tests. Results obtained for hydrophilic MS2 with the porcine tissue carrier were comparable to those from fingerpads, but lipophilic phi 6 was subject to spontaneous inactivation on human skin and proved unsuitable for fingerpad testing. These data indicate that the activities of germicides in tests with nonbiological substrates may overestimate antiviral antiseptic activity on skin surfaces. Products intended for use as antiviral antiseptics or hand-washing agents should be evaluated in a tissue carrier system. The porcine tissue carrier model provides a safe, inexpensive, accurate, and reproducible method for testing the activities of antiseptics.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of ethanol and EDTA concentrations in the expression of biofilm-producing smf-1, rpfF genes in XDR clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Deilamani M, Nikkhahi F, Bakht M, Alizadeh S, Fardsanei F, Javadi A BMC Microbiol. 2023; 23(1):277.

PMID: 37775770 PMC: 10542227. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-03008-3.


Phi 6 recovery from inoculated fingerpads based on elution buffer and methodology.

Baker C, Gibson K J Virol Methods. 2021; 299:114307.

PMID: 34606796 PMC: 9757907. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114307.


Fomite Transmission, Physicochemical Origin of Virus-Surface Interactions, and Disinfection Strategies for Enveloped Viruses with Applications to SARS-CoV-2.

Castano N, Cordts S, Kurosu Jalil M, Zhang K, Koppaka S, Bick A ACS Omega. 2021; 6(10):6509-6527.

PMID: 33748563 PMC: 7944398. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06335.


Collection efficiencies of aerosol samplers for virus-containing aerosols.

Tseng C, Li C J Aerosol Sci. 2020; 36(5):593-607.

PMID: 32287372 PMC: 7118727. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.12.004.


Exploring the whole standard operating procedure for phage therapy in clinical practice.

Cui Z, Guo X, Feng T, Li L J Transl Med. 2019; 17(1):373.

PMID: 31727099 PMC: 6857313. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-2120-z.


References
1.
Ansari S, Sattar S, Springthorpe V, Wells G, Tostowaryk W . In vivo protocol for testing efficacy of hand-washing agents against viruses and bacteria: experiments with rotavirus and Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989; 55(12):3113-8. PMC: 203232. DOI: 10.1128/aem.55.12.3113-3118.1989. View

2.
Sattar S, Springthorpe V, Karim Y, Loro P . Chemical disinfection of non-porous inanimate surfaces experimentally contaminated with four human pathogenic viruses. Epidemiol Infect. 1989; 102(3):493-505. PMC: 2249473. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800030211. View

3.
Springthorpe V, Sattar S . Chemical disinfection of human rotavirus-contaminated inanimate surfaces. J Hyg (Lond). 1986; 97(1):163-73. PMC: 2082879. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400064445. View

4.
Eggers H . Experiments on antiviral activity of hand disinfectants. Some theoretical and practical considerations. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1990; 273(1):36-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80238-0. View

5.
Davis J, SINSHEIMER R . The replication of bacteriophage MS2. 1. Transfer of parental nucleic acid to progeny phage. J Mol Biol. 1963; 6:203-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80069-8. View