» Articles » PMID: 7713425

R1 and R2 Retrotransposable Elements of Drosophila Evolve at Rates Similar to Those of Nuclear Genes

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1995 Feb 1
PMID 7713425
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The non-long-terminal repeat retrotransposable elements, R1 and R2, insert at unique locations in the 28S ribosomal RNA genes of insects. Based on the nucleotide sequences of these elements in the eight members of the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila, they have been maintained by vertical germline transmission for the 17-20 million year history of this subgroup. The stable inheritance of R1 and R2 within these species has enabled a determination of their nucleotide substitution rates. The sequence of the R1 and R2 elements from D. ambigua, a member of the obscura species group, has also been determined to enable an extrapolation of this rate over an estimated 45-60 million years. The mean rate of substitutions at synonymous sites (Ks) was 6.6 and 9.6 times the rate at replacement sites (Ka) in the R1 and R2 elements, respectively. Both elements appear to have been under selective pressure to maintain their open reading frames and thus their ability to retrotranspose for most of their evolution in these lineages. Using the rate of change at synonymous sites (Ks) as the best indicator of the nucleotide substitution rate, the mean Ks values for R1 and R2 were 2.3 and 2.2 times that of the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genes. However, this faster rate is a result of the lower codon usage bias of R1 and R2 compared with that of Adh. When the Ks rates of R1 and R2 were compared with that of a larger number of nuclear genes available from at least two of the nine species under investigation, R1 and R2 were found to evolve in most lineages at rates similar to that of nuclear genes with low codon bias. The ability of R1 and R2 to maintain their presence in this species subgroup by retrotransposition while exhibiting rates of nucleotide evolution similar to nuclear genes suggests these transposition events are rare or not as error prone as that of retroviruses.

Citing Articles

Rapid evolutionary diversification of the flamenco locus across simulans clade Drosophila species.

Signor S, Vedanayagam J, Kim B, Wierzbicki F, Kofler R, Lai E PLoS Genet. 2023; 19(8):e1010914.

PMID: 37643184 PMC: 10495008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010914.


Distribution, evolution, and diversity of retrotransposons at the flamenco locus reflect the regulatory properties of piRNA clusters.

Zanni V, Eymery A, Coiffet M, Zytnicki M, Luyten I, Quesneville H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(49):19842-7.

PMID: 24248389 PMC: 3856796. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313677110.


The reverse transcriptase encoded by the non-LTR retrotransposon R2 is as error-prone as that encoded by HIV-1.

Jamburuthugoda V, Eickbush T J Mol Biol. 2011; 407(5):661-72.

PMID: 21320510 PMC: 3062658. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.015.


Characteristics of the nuclear (18S, 5.8S, 28S and 5S) and mitochondrial (12S and 16S) rRNA genes of Apis mellifera (Insecta: Hymenoptera): structure, organization, and retrotransposable elements.

Gillespie J, Johnston J, Cannone J, Gutell R Insect Mol Biol. 2006; 15(5):657-86.

PMID: 17069639 PMC: 2048585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00689.x.


HeT-A and TART, two Drosophila retrotransposons with a bona fide role in chromosome structure for more than 60 million years.

Casacuberta E, Pardue M Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 110(1-4):152-9.

PMID: 16093667 PMC: 1188233. DOI: 10.1159/000084947.


References
1.
Jakubczak J, BURKE W, Eickbush T . Retrotransposable elements R1 and R2 interrupt the rRNA genes of most insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(8):3295-9. PMC: 51433. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3295. View

2.
Jeffs P, Holmes E, Ashburner M . The molecular evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase-related genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Mol Biol Evol. 1994; 11(2):287-304. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040110. View

3.
ONeil M, Belote J . Interspecific comparison of the transformer gene of Drosophila reveals an unusually high degree of evolutionary divergence. Genetics. 1992; 131(1):113-28. PMC: 1204946. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.113. View

4.
Jakubczak J, Zenni M, Woodruff R, Eickbush T . Turnover of R1 (type I) and R2 (type II) retrotransposable elements in the ribosomal DNA of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992; 131(1):129-42. PMC: 1204947. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.129. View

5.
Eickbush T . Transposing without ends: the non-LTR retrotransposable elements. New Biol. 1992; 4(5):430-40. View