» Articles » PMID: 7498768

Mutational Analysis of Morphologic Differentiation in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1995 Aug 1
PMID 7498768
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A genetic analysis was undertaken to investigate the mechanisms controlling cellular morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sixty mutant strains exhibiting abnormally elongated cell morphology were isolated. The cell elongation phenotype in at least 26 of the strains resulted from a single recessive mutation. These mutations, designated generically elm (elongated morphology), defined 14 genes; two of these corresponded to the previously described genes GRR1 and CDC12. Genetic interactions between mutant alleles suggest that several ELM genes play roles in the same physiological process. The cell and colony morphology and growth properties of many elm mutant strains are similar to those of wild-type yeast strains after differentiation in response to nitrogen limitation into the pseudohyphal form. Each elm mutation resulted in multiple characteristics of pseudohyphal cells, including elongated cell shape, delay in cell separation, simultaneous budding of mother and daughter cells, a unipolar budding pattern, and/or the ability to grow invasively beneath the agar surface. Mutations in 11 of the 14 ELM gene loci potentiated pseudohyphal differentiation in nitrogen-limited medium. Thus, a subset of the ELM genes are likely to affect control or execution of a defined morphologic differentiation pathway in S. cerevisiae.

Citing Articles

Translational Reprogramming Provides a Blueprint for Cellular Adaptation.

Ferretti M, Barre J, Karbstein K Cell Chem Biol. 2018; 25(11):1372-1379.e3.

PMID: 30174311 PMC: 6239892. DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.08.003.


Kinetic partitioning during de novo septin filament assembly creates a critical G1 "window of opportunity" for mutant septin function.

Schaefer R, Heasley L, Odde D, McMurray M Cell Cycle. 2016; 15(18):2441-53.

PMID: 27398993 PMC: 5026808. DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1196304.


Skp2-dependent ubiquitination and activation of LKB1 is essential for cancer cell survival under energy stress.

Lee S, Li C, Jin G, Cai Z, Han F, Chan C Mol Cell. 2015; 57(6):1022-1033.

PMID: 25728766 PMC: 5337120. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.015.


Genetic interactions with mutations affecting septin assembly reveal ESCRT functions in budding yeast cytokinesis.

McMurray M, Stefan C, Wemmer M, Odorizzi G, Emr S, Thorner J Biol Chem. 2011; 392(8-9):699-712.

PMID: 21824003 PMC: 3381890. DOI: 10.1515/BC.2011.091.


Ime1 and Ime2 are required for pseudohyphal growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on nonfermentable carbon sources.

Strudwick N, Brown M, Parmar V, Schroder M Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 30(23):5514-30.

PMID: 20876298 PMC: 2976428. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00390-10.


References
1.
Kim H, Haarer B, Pringle J . Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J Cell Biol. 1991; 112(4):535-44. PMC: 2288849. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.535. View

2.
Brewster J, de Valoir T, Dwyer N, Winter E, Gustin M . An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in yeast. Science. 1993; 259(5102):1760-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.7681220. View

3.
Park H, Chant J, Herskowitz I . BUD2 encodes a GTPase-activating protein for Bud1/Rsr1 necessary for proper bud-site selection in yeast. Nature. 1993; 365(6443):269-74. DOI: 10.1038/365269a0. View

4.
Herskowitz I . MAP kinase pathways in yeast: for mating and more. Cell. 1995; 80(2):187-97. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90402-6. View

5.
Blacketer M, Madaule P, Myers A . The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutation elm4-1 facilitates pseudohyphal differentiation and interacts with a deficiency in phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthase activity to cause constitutive pseudohyphal growth. Mol Cell Biol. 1994; 14(7):4671-81. PMC: 358840. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4671-4681.1994. View