» Articles » PMID: 7486914

Lipid-based Slow-release Formulation of Amikacin Sulfate Reduces Foreign Body-associated Infections in Mice

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1995 Aug 1
PMID 7486914
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Treatment and prophylaxis of uncomplicated infections with standard systemic antibiotics are usually successful. However, standard systemic antibiotic therapy alone is frequently unsatisfactory in certain circumstances, such as the presence of a foreign body (FB), necrotic tissue, overwhelming bacterial inoculum, or poor vascular supply to the involved tissues. We have developed a lipid-based sustained release formulation of amikacin sulfate (DepoFoam encapsulated amikacin sulfate [DEAS]) as a biodegradable, locally injectable antibiotic for such circumstances. The encapsulated drug is released over 7 to 10 days. We tested the efficacy of this formulation in an FB infection model in which Teflon tubes (length, 1 cm; outside diameter, 1.6 mm) were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue in mice and the local site was inoculated with 0.87 x 10(7) CFU of Staphylococcus aureus 3 days later. Inoculation was followed by either no treatment or a local injection of DEAS, free amikacin sulfate, non-drug-containing DepoFoam, or systemic free amikacin sulfate. All drug applications contained 1 mg of amikacin. One group was implanted with the FB and left unchallenged with bacteria and untreated as a sterile control group. All animals were sacrificed 10 days following FB implantation. FBs were retrieved from tissues by an aseptic technique and incubated in liquid culture media for 7 days. Local wound tissue was excised and processed to determine the number of CFU per gram of tissue. Treatment with local or systemic free amikacin had no effect on the number of infected FBs or on the log CFU in wound tissue compared with the untreated or non-drug-containing DepoFoam group. Compared with local free amikacin therapy, the number of infected FBs was reduced from 86 to 25% (P=0.02) following treatment with DEAS, and log CFU per gram of tissue was significantly decreased from 4.8 +/- 0.9 to 1.3 +/- 0.6 (P<0.0005). DEAS may have clinical utility as locally injected antibiotic in certain infections.

Citing Articles

Amikacin-Loaded Chitosan Hydrogel Film Cross-Linked with Folic Acid for Wound Healing Application.

Mehmood Y, Shahid H, Arshad N, Rasul A, Jamshaid T, Jamshaid M Gels. 2023; 9(7).

PMID: 37504430 PMC: 10379863. DOI: 10.3390/gels9070551.


Novel dalbavancin-PLLA implant coating prevents hematogenous infection in a minimally invasive mouse tail vein model.

Kloss M, Moerke C, Woitschach F, Wulf K, Illner S, Schulz S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:1021827.

PMID: 36466340 PMC: 9713003. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1021827.


A review on multivesicular liposomes for pharmaceutical applications: preparation, characterization, and translational challenges.

Chaurasiya A, Gorajiya A, Panchal K, Katke S, Singh A Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021; 12(7):1569-1587.

PMID: 34599471 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-021-01060-y.


Multivesicular Liposome (Depofoam) in Human Diseases.

Salehi B, Mishra A, Nigam M, Kobarfard F, Javed Z, Rajabi S Iran J Pharm Res. 2020; 19(2):9-21.

PMID: 33224207 PMC: 7667536. DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.112291.13663.


Injectable Lipid-Based Depot Formulations: Where Do We Stand?.

Rahnfeld L, Luciani P Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(6).

PMID: 32575406 PMC: 7356974. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060567.


References
1.
Gerding D, Larson T . Aminoglycoside resistance in gram-negative bacilli during increased amikacin use. Comparison of experience in 14 United States hospitals with experience in the Minneapolis Veterans Administration Medical Center. Am J Med. 1985; 79(1A):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90184-6. View

2.
Kim S, Chatelut E, Kim J, Howell S, Cates C, Kormanik P . Extended CSF cytarabine exposure following intrathecal administration of DTC 101. J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11(11):2186-93. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2186. View

3.
ELEK S, Conen P . The virulence of Staphylococcus pyogenes for man; a study of the problems of wound infection. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957; 38(6):573-86. PMC: 2083292. View

4.
Edlich R, Panek P, Rodeheaver G, Turnbull V, KURTZ L, Edgerton M . Physical and chemical configuration of sutures in the development of surgical infection. Ann Surg. 1973; 177(6):679-88. PMC: 1355944. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197306000-00006. View

5.
Sugarman B, Young E . Infections associated with prosthetic devices: magnitude of the problem. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1989; 3(2):187-98. View