» Articles » PMID: 7459999

The Parcellation Theory and Its Relation to Interspecific Variability in Brain Organization, Evolutionary and Ontogenetic Development, and Neuronal Plasticity

Overview
Journal Cell Tissue Res
Date 1980 Jan 1
PMID 7459999
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently discovered neocortical equivalents in anamniotes and certain patterns of interspecific variability in brain organization provide new insights into evolutionary and ontogenetic mechanisms of development. The new data suggest that nervous systems become more complex, not by one system invading another, but by a process of parcellation that involves the selective loss of connections of the newly formed daughter aggregates and subsystems. The parcellation process is reflected in the normal ontogenetic development of the CNS in a given species and can be manipulated, to a certain extent, by deprivation or surgically induced sprouting. The parcellation theory allows certain predictions about the range of variation of a given system at all levels of analysis including the cellular and aggregate levels. For example, the interspecific variability in organization of cortical columns, thalamic nuclei, cortical areas and tectal layers can be explained. The findings, summarized here, suggest that diffuse, undifferentiated systems existed in the beginning of vertebrate evolution and that during the evolution of complex behaviors, and analytical capacities related to these behaviors, a range of patterns of neural systems evolved that relate to these functions. One principle underlying the growth, differentiation and multiplication of neural systems appears to be the process of parcellation as defined by the theory.

Citing Articles

Selective expansion of motor cortical projections in the evolution of vocal novelty.

Isko E, Harpole C, Zheng X, Zhan H, Davis M, Zador A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39484467 PMC: 11526862. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.13.612752.


Neuronal Circuit Evolution: From Development to Structure and Adaptive Significance.

Konstantinides N, Desplan C Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2024; .

PMID: 38951021 PMC: 11688512. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041493.


Could theropod dinosaurs have evolved to a human level of intelligence?.

Reiner A J Comp Neurol. 2023; 531(9):975-1006.

PMID: 37029483 PMC: 10106414. DOI: 10.1002/cne.25458.


"Dendroarchitectonics": From Santiago Ramón y Cajal to Enrique Ramón-Moliner or vice versa?.

Geser F, Haybaeck J, Yilmazer-Hanke D Neurol Sci. 2022; 43(10):5807-5820.

PMID: 35674996 PMC: 9474365. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06151-3.


Distributed Motor Control of Limb Movements in Rat Motor and Somatosensory Cortex: The Sensorimotor Amalgam Revisited.

Halley A, Baldwin M, Cooke D, Englund M, Krubitzer L Cereb Cortex. 2020; 30(12):6296-6312.

PMID: 32691053 PMC: 8248848. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa186.


References
1.
Schroeder D, Vanegas H, EBBESSON S . Cytoarchitecture of the optic tectum of the squirrelfish, Holocentrus. J Comp Neurol. 1980; 191(3):337-51. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901910303. View

2.
Bowsher D . Brain, behaviour and evolution. Brain Behav Evol. 1973; 8(5):386-96. DOI: 10.1159/000124393. View

3.
Lynch G, Stanfield B, Parks T, Cotman C . Evidence for selective post-lesion axonal growth in the dentate gyrus of the rat. Brain Res. 1974; 69(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90365-5. View

4.
Karten H, Hodos W, Nauta W, REVZIN A . Neural connections of the "visual wulst" of the avian telencephalon. Experimental studies in the piegon (Columba livia) and owl (Speotyto cunicularia). J Comp Neurol. 1973; 150(3):253-78. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901500303. View

5.
EBBESSON S, Hodde K . Ascending spinal systems in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Cell Tissue Res. 1981; 216(2):313-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233622. View